Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
The Radeon R8 M365DX has 3% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Radeon R8 M365DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2014. Its Broadwell GT3e chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 8.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 309th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon R8 M365DX GPU
The Radeon R8 M365DX is an end-of-life integrated graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q2 2015. Its Meso chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
The Radeon R8 M365DX has the 305th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.73% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q3 2014 | Q2 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Rise of the Tomb Raider | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 768p | -- | 21 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | 16 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 11 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 12 | +5% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 11.4 | |
| Radeon R8 M445DX | 8 | -30% |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 7 | -39% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 6.5 | -43% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon R8 M365DX has 3% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 309th with a score of 2,766, and the Radeon R8 M365DX is ranked 305th with a score of 2,862.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Radeon R8 M365DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | +16% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | +9% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | +8% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +5% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | +3% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | -0% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | -3% |
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | -8% |
| Iris Graphics 550 | 2,533.5 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,387.5 (+36.28%) | 11,291 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,736.5 | 1,902 (+9.53%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,094 (+23.49%) | 2,505.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 32.3 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,466 (+126.58%) | 647 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 564 (+186.29%) | 197 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Meso |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,550 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 256 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | -- |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 384 |
| Shading Units | 384 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 6 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 48 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 1,125 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.6 GPixel/s | 9 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 52.8 GTexel/s | 27 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 864 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 54 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M365DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.