Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 620093% better
2,7663% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8650G
1,4331% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 93% better performance than the Radeon HD 8650G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
Radeon HD 8650G
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Radeon HD 8650G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Shop Radeon HD 8650G
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q3 2014. It is built on the Generation 8.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Broadwell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 313th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon HD 8650G GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8650G is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the TeraScale 3 GPU microarchitecture (codename Devastator) and is manufactured on a 32 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8650G includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 533 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 720 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8650G has the 412th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.37% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q3 2014 | Q2 2013 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
X-Plane 11
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Dota 2 - Reborn
Rocket League
The Witcher 3
GTA V
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
X-Plane 11 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 19 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 18 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 17 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 17 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 orRadeon HD 8650G
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8650G | 16.9 | |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 7 | -59% |
| UHD Graphics 630 | 6.96 | -59% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 orRadeon HD 8650G
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 620093% better
2,7663% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8650G
1,4331% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 93% better performance than the Radeon HD 8650G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 313th with a score of 2,766, and the Radeon HD 8650G is ranked 412th with a score of 1,433.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
No data available
Radeon HD 8650G
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and the Radeon HD 8650G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | +5% |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | +3% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | -0% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | -3% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | 1,458 | -47% |
| Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 1,437.5 | -48% |
| Radeon HD 7660D | 1,433 | -48% |
| Radeon HD 8650G | 1,433 | -48% |
| HD Graphics 5600 | 1,431 | -48% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 6200 orRadeon HD 8650G
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 15,387.5 (+138.45%) | 6,453 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,736.5 (+91.88%) | 905 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,094 (+109.12%) | 1,479.5 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 33 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,471 (+180.73%) | 524 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 574 (+310%) | 140 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 10.9 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 6.2 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Broadwell GT3e | Devastator |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,303 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 384 |
| Shading Units | 384 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 6 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 48 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 533 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 720 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.6 GPixel/s | 5.76 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 52.8 GTexel/s | 17.28 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 553 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.