Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
3,2203% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q632% better
23,57423% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 632% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 580
Shop Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT4e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 includes 576 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 72 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 9 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has the 294th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU104) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 4000 Max-Q has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 384 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 4000 Max-Q includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 780 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,380 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 160 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 320 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 40 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 4000 Max-Q has the 98th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 22.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2019 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
X-Plane 11
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Dota 2 - Reborn
The Witcher 3
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
X-Plane 11 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 93 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 79 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 66 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 45 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 62 | +37% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 60 | +32% |
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 55 | +21% |
| Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 55 | +21% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile | 53 | +17% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 45.3 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 44 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 44 | -3% |
| RTX A3000 Mobile | 40.5 | -11% |
| Arc A770M | 38.5 | -15% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
3,2203% of 104,598
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q632% better
23,57423% of 104,598
The Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q has 632% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is ranked 294th with a score of 3,220, and the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is ranked 98th with a score of 23,574.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | 24,620 | +665% |
| Radeon RX 5600M | 24,213 | +652% |
| Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | 23,574 | +632% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q | 23,540 | +631% |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | 22,575.5 | +601% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | +0% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 6,764 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 6,724 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,594 | 35,167 (+140.97%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,903 | 17,049 (+795.9%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,510 | 19,888 (+466.61%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 85.6 | 210.5 (+145.91%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,982 | 12,487 (+530.02%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 364 | 562 (+54.4%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | TU104 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 13,600 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 384 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 80 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 576 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,560 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 40 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 72 | 160 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 9 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 320 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 40 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,380 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.55 GPixel/s | 88.32 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 68.4 GTexel/s | 220.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 7.07 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 273.6 GFLOPS | 220.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.