Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
3,2203% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950M36% better
4,3674% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 950M has 36% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
GeForce GTX 950M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the GeForce GTX 950M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 580
Shop GeForce GTX 950M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT4e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 includes 576 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 72 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 9 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has the 294th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 950M has 4 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 950M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 993 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,124 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The GTX 950M has the 265th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.18% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q1 2015 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 2020
Gears Tactics
Borderlands 3
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Control
F1 2019
Total War: Three Kingdoms
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 2020 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 80 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 38 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 29 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 19 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 13 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GTX 950M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 20 | +59% |
| GeForce GTX 950M | 12.6 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GTX 950M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580
3,2203% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950M36% better
4,3674% of 104,598
The GeForce GTX 950M has 36% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is ranked 294th with a score of 3,220, and the GeForce GTX 950M is ranked 265th with a score of 4,367.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
GeForce GTX 950M
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the GeForce GTX 950M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce MX150 | 4,494 | +40% |
| GeForce GTX 850M | 4,385.5 | +36% |
| GeForce GTX 950M | 4,367 | +36% |
| Quadro M1000M | 4,229.5 | +31% |
| FirePro W5170M | 4,197 | +30% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | +0% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GTX 950M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 971 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 1,094 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,594 | 21,355.5 (+46.33%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,903 | 3,200 (+68.16%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,510 | 4,574.5 (+30.33%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 85.6 (+69.84%) | 50.4 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,982 | 2,588 (+30.58%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 364 (+66.21%) | 219 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 42.1 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 33.9 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | GM107 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,870 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 28.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 900 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 75 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 576 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 640 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 72 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 9 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,124 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.55 GPixel/s | 17.98 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 68.4 GTexel/s | 44.96 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 1,439 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 273.6 GFLOPS | 44.96 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | GeForce GTX 950M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 (5.1) |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.