Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

VS
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580165% better
3,2203% of 104,598
GeForce GT 720M
1,2131% of 104,598

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 165% better performance than the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
GeForce GT 720M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Pro Graphics 580
Shop GeForce GT 720M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 GPU

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT4e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 includes 576 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 72 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 9 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has the 294th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GT 720M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 12.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GT 720M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 938 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The GT 720M has the 432nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.16% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
ManufacturerIntelNVIDIA
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0Fermi 2.0
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ3 2015Q2 2013
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Display FPS for New World
New World
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2
Display FPS for Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Display FPS for Immortals Fenyx Rising
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Display FPS for Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Display FPS for Star Wars: Squadrons
Star Wars: Squadrons

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Riders Republic
Riders Republic
Iris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
Low - 720p
--
11 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GT 720M
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R5 M25514+27%
GeForce GT 720M11

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GT 720M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 580165% better
3,2203% of 104,598
GeForce GT 720M
1,2131% of 104,598

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 165% better performance than the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is ranked 294th with a score of 3,220, and the GeForce GT 720M is ranked 432nd with a score of 1,213.

Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 580
No data available
GeForce GT 720M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the GeForce GT 720M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 580 orGeForce GT 720M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,594
(+168.96%)
5,426
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,903
(+131.51%)
822
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,510
(+165.71%)
1,321
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
85.6
(+137.78%)
36
PassMark G3D Mark
1,982
(+330.87%)
460
PassMark G2D Mark
364
(+208.47%)
118
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
11.6
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
11.6
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
CodenameSkylake GT4eGF117
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0Fermi 2.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedDDR3
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent12.8 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared64 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache--128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W33 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
Shading Units576--
CUDA Cores--96
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)7216
Render Output Units (ROP)98
Core Clock Speed350 MHz625 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)950 MHz938 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
Pixel Fill Rate8.55 GPixel/s3.1 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate68.4 GTexel/s12.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1,094 GFLOPS297.6 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance273.6 GFLOPS24.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Pro Graphics 580GeForce GT 720M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL3.01.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.45.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.