Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) has 65% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 GPU
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2015. Its Skylake GT4e chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 9.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 has the 291st highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.07% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) GPU
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2020. Its Tiger Lake GT2 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.1 architecture and is fabricated on the 10 nm process.
Compatibility
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) has the 238th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.06% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q3 2020 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 10 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 8 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon 780M | 21.1 | +173% |
| Radeon 760M | 19.6 | +153% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 10.5 | +36% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 8 | +3% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 7.74 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) has 65% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 580 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 580 is ranked 291st with a score of 3,220, and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) is ranked 238th with a score of 5,309.5.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 580 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 6,523.5 | +103% |
| Radeon RX Vega 11 | 5,483 | +70% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 5,309.5 | +65% |
| Radeon RX Vega 7 | 5,244 | +63% |
| UHD Graphics (Alder Lake, 64EU) | 4,832.5 | +50% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | +0% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | +0% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | -6% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 1,179 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 1,333 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,594 | 21,817.5 (+49.5%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,903 | 3,986.5 (+109.49%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 15,172 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,510 | 5,591.5 (+59.3%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 85.6 | 85.9 (+0.35%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,982 | 2,683 (+35.37%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 364 (+0.83%) | 361 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 43.8 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 57.3 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake GT4e | Tiger Lake GT2 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
| L2 Cache | -- | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 576 | 640 |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 80 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 72 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 9 | 20 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.55 GPixel/s | 22 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 68.4 GTexel/s | 44 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 1,408 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 273.6 GFLOPS | 352 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.