Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Intel HD Graphics 530
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 41% better performance than the HD Graphics 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and the HD Graphics 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Generation 7.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Haswell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 22 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 includes 320 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 200 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,150 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has the 366th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel HD Graphics 530 GPU
The Intel HD Graphics 530 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT2) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD Graphics 530 includes 192 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 3 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD Graphics 530 has the 419th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.30% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q3 2015 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Hitman 2 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 12 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630 | 12.8 | +8% |
| HD Graphics 530 | 11.9 | |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 6 | -50% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 41% better performance than the HD Graphics 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is ranked 366th with a score of 1,923, and the HD Graphics 530 is ranked 419th with a score of 1,362.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and the HD Graphics 530 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | +14% |
| UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake, 32EU) | 2,127 | +11% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | 1,923 | |
| Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | 1,792 | -7% |
| UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2, 64EU) | 1,791.5 | -7% |
| HD Graphics 5600 | 1,431 | -26% |
| HD Graphics 6000 | 1,395.5 | -27% |
| HD Graphics 530 | 1,362 | -29% |
| HD Graphics 520 | 1,293.5 | -33% |
| Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) | 1,264 | -34% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 235 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 271 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 11,930 (+59.07%) | 7,500 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,380.5 (+47.65%) | 935 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,217 (+40.41%) | 1,579 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 52.3 (+23.64%) | 42.3 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,202 (+21.17%) | 992 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 405 (+61.35%) | 251 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 20.8 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 21.9 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Skylake GT2 |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 9.0 |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 320 | 192 |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 24 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 40 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 3 |
| Core Clock Speed | 200 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,150 MHz | 950 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | 2.85 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46 GTexel/s | 22.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 736 GFLOPS | 364.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 184 GFLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | HD Graphics 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.