Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 520024% better
1,9232% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8670D
1,5471% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 24% better performance than the Radeon HD 8670D for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No data available
Radeon HD 8670D
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and the Radeon HD 8670D for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Shop Radeon HD 8670D
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 GPU
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the Generation 7.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Haswell GT3e) and is manufactured on a 22 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 includes 320 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 200 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,150 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 45 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has the 366th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.84% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon HD 8670D GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8670D is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q1 2013. It is built on the TeraScale 3 GPU microarchitecture (codename Devastator) and is manufactured on a 32 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8670D includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 844 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8670D has the 404th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.48% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2013 | Q1 2013 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
The Witcher 3
GTA V
BioShock Infinite
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
The Witcher 3 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 21 FPS |
| Medium - 768p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 5200 orRadeon HD 8670D
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R8 M445DX | 23 | +8% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU) | 21.6 | +2% |
| Radeon HD 8670D | 21.2 | |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 20 | -6% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 17.6 | -17% |
| UHD Graphics 630 | 16 | -25% |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 16 | -25% |
| Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | 16 | -25% |
| Radeon HD 8650G | 15.6 | -26% |
| Radeon HD 7660G | 15.1 | -29% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 5200 orRadeon HD 8670D
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Pro Graphics 520024% better
1,9232% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8670D
1,5471% of 104,598
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 24% better performance than the Radeon HD 8670D for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is ranked 366th with a score of 1,923, and the Radeon HD 8670D is ranked 404th with a score of 1,547.
Performance per dollar
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
No data available
Radeon HD 8670D
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and the Radeon HD 8670D for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | +14% |
| UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake, 32EU) | 2,127 | +11% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | 1,923 | |
| Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | 1,792 | -7% |
| UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2, 64EU) | 1,791.5 | -7% |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU) | 1,654 | -14% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) | 1,589 | -17% |
| Radeon HD 8670D | 1,547 | -20% |
| UHD Graphics 617 | 1,540.5 | -20% |
| HD Graphics 620 | 1,508.5 | -22% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Pro Graphics 5200 orRadeon HD 8670D
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 11,930 (+43.94%) | 8,288 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,380.5 (+19.32%) | 1,157 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,217 (+31.81%) | 1,682 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 52.3 (+16.48%) | 44.9 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,202 (+126.79%) | 530 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 405 (+116.58%) | 187 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 20.8 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 21.9 | -- |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Haswell GT3e | Devastator |
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Size | 22 nm | 32 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,303 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 W | 100 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 384 |
| Shading Units | 320 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 40 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 4 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 200 MHz | 844 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,150 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 4.6 GPixel/s | 6.75 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 46 GTexel/s | 20.26 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 736 GFLOPS | 648.2 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 184 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon HD 8670D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Intel UHD Graphics 620
vs
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
vs
Intel UHD Graphics 617Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake, 32EU)
vs
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2, 64EU)
vs
Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
vs
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU)
vs
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
vs
Intel UHD Graphics 617Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake, 32EU)
vs
AMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo)Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2, 64EU)
vs
Intel UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 16EU)AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
vs
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 24EU)
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.