Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) vs AMD Radeon HD 8610G
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) has 263% better performance than the Radeon HD 8610G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) and the Radeon HD 8610G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Ice Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 has the 292nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.08% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon HD 8610G GPU
The AMD Radeon HD 8610G is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the TeraScale 3 GPU microarchitecture (codename Devastator) and is manufactured on a 32 nm process.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD 8610G includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 533 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 626 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD 8610G has the 470th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.85% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2019 | Q2 2013 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
X-Plane 11 | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | -- | 14 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 10 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 9 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8650G | 17.1 | +89% |
| Radeon HD 7660G | 9.28 | +3% |
| Radeon HD 8610G | 9.03 | |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) | 8 | -11% |
| UHD Graphics 610 | 7 | -22% |
| Radeon HD 8350G | 6.08 | -33% |
| Radeon HD 8400 | 4.68 | -48% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) has 263% better performance than the Radeon HD 8610G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) is ranked 292nd with a score of 3,225, and the Radeon HD 8610G is ranked 470th with a score of 889.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) and the Radeon HD 8610G for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 770 | 3,428 | +6% |
| Radeon RX Vega 10 | 3,389 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | 3,225 | |
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | -0% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | -0% |
| UHD Graphics 610 | 922.5 | -71% |
| HD Graphics 4600 | 910.5 | -72% |
| Radeon HD 8610G | 889 | -72% |
| HD Graphics 610 | 880 | -73% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) | 854 | -74% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 646 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 732 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,910 (+442.38%) | 2,749 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 2,124 (+347.16%) | 475 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 9,179 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,461 (+267.8%) | 941 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 55.5 (+147.77%) | 22.4 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 418 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 119 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 30.5 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 33.5 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Ice Lake GT1 | Devastator |
| Architecture | Generation 11.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Size | 10 nm | 32 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 1,303 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 35 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 384 |
| Shading Units | 384 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 8 | 8 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 533 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,050 MHz | 626 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 8.4 GPixel/s | 5.01 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 15.02 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | 480.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 201.6 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake, 48EU) | Radeon HD 8610G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.