Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2,8943% of 104,598
Quadro M2200155% better
7,3727% of 104,598
The Quadro M2200 has 155% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
Quadro M2200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
Shop Quadro M2200
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro M2200 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2017. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The M2200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,377 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 88.13 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The M2200 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 695 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,036 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The M2200 has the 214th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q2 2018 | Q1 2017 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Our database does not have gaming performance data for the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 or the NVIDIA Quadro M2200.
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655
2,8943% of 104,598
Quadro M2200155% better
7,3727% of 104,598
The Quadro M2200 has 155% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 655 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894, and the Quadro M2200 is ranked 214th with a score of 7,372.
Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
Quadro M2200
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Quadro M2200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 7,678.5 | +165% |
| Radeon Pro 560X | 7,590 | +162% |
| Quadro M2200 | 7,372 | +155% |
| GeForce GTX 965M | 7,322 | +153% |
| GeForce GTX 870M | 7,156 | +147% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | +3% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | -1% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | -4% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orQuadro M2200
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 604.5 | 1,724 (+185.19%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 684 | 1,903 (+178.22%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,343 | 37,796 (+163.52%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,983 | 5,850 (+195.01%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,180.5 | 7,581 (+138.36%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 74 | 103.9 (+40.41%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,746 | 4,294 (+145.93%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 364 | 383 (+5.22%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | GM206 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 2,940 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 88.13 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,377 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 55 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 384 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,024 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 695 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,050 MHz | 1,036 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.3 GPixel/s | 33.15 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 50.4 GTexel/s | 66.3 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | 2.12 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 201.6 GFLOPS | 66.3 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.