Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)

VS
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655239% better
2,8943% of 104,598
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
8541% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 239% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
Shop UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2021. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jasper Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics includes 128 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 750 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics has the 475th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.82% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
ManufacturerIntelIntel
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Generation 11.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ2 2018Q1 2021
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Elden Ring
Elden Ring
Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021
Display FPS for Total War: Three Kingdoms
Total War: Three Kingdoms
Display FPS for Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Elden Ring
Elden Ring
Iris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
Low - 1080p
--
5 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
GPUFrames Per Second
UHD Graphics 77020.6+298%
Radeon RX Vega 1019+267%
UHD Graphics 6206.29+21%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)5.18

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655239% better
2,8943% of 104,598
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
8541% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 239% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894, and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) is ranked 475th with a score of 854.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
604.5
(+239.61%)
178
3DMark Time Spy Score
684
(+236.95%)
203
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,343
(+192.09%)
4,910.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,983
(+207.44%)
645
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,180.5
(+226.04%)
975.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
74
(+182.44%)
26.2
PassMark G3D Mark
1,746
(+17.65%)
1,484
PassMark G2D Mark
364
(+32.85%)
274
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
CodenameCoffee Lake GT3eJasper Lake GT1
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Generation 11.0
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
Bus InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
Shading Units384128
Execution Units (EU)--24
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)488
Render Output Units (ROP)64
Core Clock Speed300 MHz350 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,050 MHz750 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
Pixel Fill Rate6.3 GPixel/s3 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate50.4 GTexel/s6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance806.4 GFLOPS192 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance201.6 GFLOPS48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU)
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.