Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 5% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q2 2018. Its Coffee Lake GT3e chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 9.5 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This GPU is paired with System Shared of VRAM. Its System Shared memory clock and System Shared interface gives it a bandwidth of System Dependent. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 303rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.76% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 GPU
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q3 2014. Its Broadwell GT3e chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 8.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 14 nm process.
This integrated card has a TDP of 15 W.
The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has the 309th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.64% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q2 2018 | Q3 2014 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 5% better performance than the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 303rd with a score of 2,894, and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is ranked 309th with a score of 2,766.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| UHD Graphics Xe (Tiger Lake, 32EU) | 3,222 | +11% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 580 | 3,220 | +11% |
| Radeon Graphics (128SP) | 3,026 | +5% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 645 | 2,985 | +3% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 2,894 | |
| Radeon R8 M365DX | 2,862.5 | -1% |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | 2,766 | -4% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 650 | 2,762 | -5% |
| Radeon R6 M340DX | 2,681 | -7% |
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | -12% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 604.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 684 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 14,343 | 15,387.5 (+7.28%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,983 (+14.2%) | 1,736.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 3,180.5 (+2.8%) | 3,094 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 74 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,746 (+19.1%) | 1,466 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 364 | 564 (+54.95%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT3e | Broadwell GT3e |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | System Shared |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | Ring Bus |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Motherboard Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Execution Units (EU) | -- | 48 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 6 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,050 MHz | 1,100 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.3 GPixel/s | 6.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 50.4 GTexel/s | 52.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | 844.8 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 201.6 GFLOPS | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.