Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250

VS
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655585% better
2,8943% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8250
422.50% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 585% better performance than the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
Radeon HD 8250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Plus Graphics 655
Shop Radeon HD 8250
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q2 2018. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Coffee Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.77% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon HD 8250 GPU

The AMD Radeon HD 8250 is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q2 2013. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kalindi) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD 8250 includes 128 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 400 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 8 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 8 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD 8250 has the 527th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.40% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 2.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ2 2018Q2 2013
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Display FPS for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
CS: GO

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Iris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
Low - 720p
--
19 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
9 FPS
High - 768p
--
8 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orRadeon HD 8250
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon R3 (Beema)13.3+66%
Radeon HD 8610G10.9+36%
Radeon HD 833010+25%
Radeon HD 7400G9+13%
Radeon R2 (Beema)8.9+11%
Radeon HD 82508
Radeon HD 82107.1-11%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orRadeon HD 8250
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 655585% better
2,8943% of 104,598
Radeon HD 8250
422.50% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 has 585% better performance than the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Plus Graphics 655 is ranked 306th with a score of 2,894, and the Radeon HD 8250 is ranked 527th with a score of 422.5.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 655
No data available
Radeon HD 8250
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 655 and the Radeon HD 8250 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 655 orRadeon HD 8250
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
604.5
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
684
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
14,343
(+629.92%)
1,965
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,983
(+682.25%)
253.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,180.5
(+579.59%)
468
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
74
--
PassMark G3D Mark
1,746
(+723.58%)
212
PassMark G2D Mark
364
(+516.95%)
59
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
3.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
2.9
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
CodenameCoffee Lake GT3eKalindi
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 2.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--1,178 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W8 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
Stream Processors (SP)--128
Shading Units384--
Compute Units (CU)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)488
Render Output Units (ROP)64
Core Clock Speed300 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,050 MHz400 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
Pixel Fill Rate6.3 GPixel/s1.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate50.4 GTexel/s3.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance806.4 GFLOPS102.4 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance201.6 GFLOPS6.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 655Radeon HD 8250
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.