Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)

VS
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 64050% better
2,3792% of 104,598
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
1,5892% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 50% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shop UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) GPU

The Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2021. It is built on the Generation 11.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Jasper Lake GT1) and is manufactured on a 10 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The UHD Graphics includes 256 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 850 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The UHD Graphics has the 402nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
ManufacturerIntelIntel
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Generation 11.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ1 2017Q1 2021
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Display FPS for Farming Simulator 22
Farming Simulator 22
Display FPS for Back 4 Blood
Back 4 Blood
Display FPS for Alan Wake Remastered
Alan Wake Remastered
Display FPS for New World
New World
Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Iris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
Low - 1080p
--
5 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
7 FPS
High - 1080p
--
4 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
GPUFrames Per Second
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)4.25
UHD Graphics 6203.3-22%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 64050% better
2,3792% of 104,598
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
1,5892% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 50% better performance than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379, and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) is ranked 402nd with a score of 1,589.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU) for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
437
(+32.42%)
330
3DMark Time Spy Score
494.5
(+32.93%)
372
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
11,248
(+61.22%)
6,977
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,393.5
(+37.16%)
1,016
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
4,588
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,561
(+55.02%)
1,652
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
56.2
(+77.85%)
31.6
PassMark G3D Mark
1,343
--
PassMark G2D Mark
341
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
12.6
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
13.7
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eJasper Lake GT1
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Generation 11.0
Process Size14 nm10 nm

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
Bus InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W10 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
Shading Units384256
Execution Units (EU)--32
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4816
Render Output Units (ROP)68
Core Clock Speed300 MHz350 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz850 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
Pixel Fill Rate6.6 GPixel/s6.8 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate52.8 GTexel/s13.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance844.8 GFLOPS435.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance211.2 GFLOPS108.8 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 32EU)
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.