Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon RX 57001,223% better
31,47030% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 5700 has 1,223% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon RX 5700
90.1756% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 5700 has 56% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shop Radeon RX 5700
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU
The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon RX 5700 GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $349. It is built on the RDNA 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 10) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The RX 5700 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 448 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 5700 includes 2,304 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,465 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,725 MHz. It usually operates at 1,625 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 144 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 5700 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 180 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 5700 has the 69th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 30.09% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 31,470 score and $349 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 90.17. This is the 25th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2017 | Q3 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $349 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
Horizon Forbidden West
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Sons of the Forest
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 205 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 179 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 130 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 94 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 72 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 42 FPS |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon RX 5700
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 41.8 | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 22.2 | -47% |
| Arc A770 | 21.2 | -49% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 17 | -59% |
| Arc A750 | 16.8 | -60% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 13.9 | -67% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 9.5 | -77% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon RX 5700
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 5700 | 8.35 | |
| Arc A770 | 15.52 | +86% |
| Arc A750 | 17.2 | +106% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 17.97 | +115% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER | 28.71 | +244% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 29.35 | +252% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 34.63 | +315% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon RX 57001,223% better
31,47030% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 5700 has 1,223% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379, and the Radeon RX 5700 is ranked 69th with a score of 31,470.
Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon RX 5700
90.1756% of 161.45
The Radeon RX 5700 has 138% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX 5700's 90.17 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 34,963.5 | +1,370% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 31,774 | +1,236% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 31,470 | +1,223% |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 31,310 | +1,216% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 31,260 | +1,214% |
| UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) | 2,551 | +7% |
| Iris Graphics 550 | 2,533.5 | +6% |
| Iris Plus Graphics 640 | 2,379 | |
| Iris Graphics 540 | 2,211.5 | -7% |
| Radeon R6 M255DX | 2,198 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon RX 5700
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | +14% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 96.58 | +7% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.18 | +7% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.98 | +6% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 95.09 | +5% |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 90.17 | |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 89.78 | -0% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 86.4 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 86.25 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 86.18 | -4% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 437 | 8,051 (+1,742.33%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 494.5 | 8,478 (+1,614.46%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 11,248 | 132,911 (+1,081.64%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,393.5 | 23,746 (+1,604.05%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 88,119 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 2,561 | 27,649.5 (+979.64%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 56.2 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,343 | 14,455 (+976.32%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 341 | 886 (+159.82%) |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT3e | Navi 10 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 10,300 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 448 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 256 bit |
| L2 Cache | -- | 4 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 180 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 2,304 |
| Shading Units | 384 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 36 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 144 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 6 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 300 MHz | 1,465 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,100 MHz | 1,725 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | -- | 1,625 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 6.6 GPixel/s | 110.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 52.8 GTexel/s | 248.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | 496.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.