Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R9 M375

VS
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M37539% better
3,3143% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M375 has 39% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shop Radeon R9 M375
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M375 GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M375 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Tropo) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M375 has 2 GB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 28.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M375 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,015 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M375 has the 288th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 1.0
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q2 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Destiny 2
Destiny 2
Display FPS for Fortnite
Fortnite
Display FPS for Dota 2 - Reborn
Dota 2 - Reborn
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Iris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
Low - 720p
--
24 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
13 FPS
High - 1080p
--
12 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
10 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 950M16+60%
Radeon R9 M37510
GeForce 940MX8-20%
GeForce 930MX7-30%
GeForce MX1307-30%
GeForce 920MX6-40%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 640
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M37539% better
3,3143% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 M375 has 39% better performance than the Iris Plus Graphics 640 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379, and the Radeon R9 M375 is ranked 288th with a score of 3,314.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon R9 M375
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the Radeon R9 M375 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 760M3,369+42%
GeForce MX2303,363.5+41%
Radeon R9 M3753,314+39%
GeForce 945M3,309.5+39%
Radeon R9 M2753,261+37%
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)2,551+7%
Iris Graphics 5502,533.5+6%
Iris Plus Graphics 6402,379
Iris Graphics 5402,211.5-7%
Radeon R6 M255DX2,198-8%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R9 M375
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
437
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
494.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
11,248
(+32.86%)
8,466
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,393.5
1,667
(+19.63%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,561
3,269
(+27.65%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
56.2
(+23.52%)
45.5
PassMark G3D Mark
1,343
(+38.45%)
970
PassMark G2D Mark
341
(+107.93%)
164
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eTropo
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 1.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--1,500 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedDDR3
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent28.8 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared128 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
Stream Processors (SP)--640
Shading Units384--
Compute Units (CU)--10
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4840
Render Output Units (ROP)616
Core Clock Speed300 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz1,015 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
Pixel Fill Rate6.6 GPixel/s16.24 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate52.8 GTexel/s40.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance844.8 GFLOPS1,299 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance211.2 GFLOPS81.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R9 M375
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.