Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs AMD Radeon R6 M255DX

VS
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 6408% better
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon R6 M255DX
2,1982% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 8% better performance than the Radeon R6 M255DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon R6 M255DX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the Radeon R6 M255DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Iris Plus Graphics 640
Shop Radeon R6 M255DX
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has the 335th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R6 M255DX GPU

The AMD Radeon R6 M255DX is an end-of-life integrated graphics card that released in Q4 2014. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Topaz) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R6 M255DX includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 925 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 940 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The R6 M255DX has the 348th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.10% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 3.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ1 2017Q4 2014
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite
Iris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
Low - 720p
--
47 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
31 FPS
High - 768p
--
26 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
13 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R6 M255DX

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R6 M255DX
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Iris Plus Graphics 6408% better
2,3792% of 104,598
Radeon R6 M255DX
2,1982% of 104,598

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 8% better performance than the Radeon R6 M255DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Iris Plus Graphics 640 is ranked 335th with a score of 2,379, and the Radeon R6 M255DX is ranked 348th with a score of 2,198.

Performance per dollar
Iris Plus Graphics 640
No data available
Radeon R6 M255DX
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Iris Plus Graphics 640 and the Radeon R6 M255DX for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Iris Plus Graphics 640 orRadeon R6 M255DX
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
437
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
494.5
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
11,248
(+56.83%)
7,172
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,393.5
(+25.03%)
1,114.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
2,561
(+29.41%)
1,979
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
56.2
(+125.7%)
24.9
PassMark G3D Mark
1,343
(+121.98%)
605
PassMark G2D Mark
341
(+193.97%)
116
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
CodenameKaby Lake GT3eTopaz
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5GCN 3.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors--1,550 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
Memory SizeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory TypeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory BandwidthSystem DependentSystem Dependent
Memory ClockSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory InterfaceSystem SharedSystem Shared
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache--256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
Bus InterfaceRing BusIGP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
Stream Processors (SP)--384
Shading Units384--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4824
Render Output Units (ROP)68
Core Clock Speed300 MHz925 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,100 MHz940 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
Pixel Fill Rate6.6 GPixel/s7.52 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate52.8 GTexel/s22.56 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance844.8 GFLOPS721.9 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance211.2 GFLOPS45.12 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecIris Plus Graphics 640Radeon R6 M255DX
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.