Intel HD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

VS
Performance
HD Graphics 630
1,7292% of 104,598
GeForce MX350257% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 257% better performance than the HD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
HD Graphics 630
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 630 and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop HD Graphics 630
Shop GeForce MX350
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel HD Graphics 630 GPU

The Intel HD Graphics 630 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2016. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT2) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The HD Graphics 630 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The HD Graphics 630 includes 192 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 3 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The HD Graphics 630 has the 385th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX350 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce MX350 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2020. It is built on the Pascal GPU microarchitecture (codename GP107S) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The MX350 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,752 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 56.06 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The MX350 includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,354 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,468 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 20 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The MX350 has the 227th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
ManufacturerIntelNVIDIA
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Pascal
Market SegmentIntegratedMobile
Release DateQ3 2016Q1 2020
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Ready or Not
Ready or Not
Display FPS for The Finals
The Finals
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for EA Sports WRC
EA Sports WRC
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
HD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
Low - 1080p
--
26 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
14 FPS
High - 1080p
--
13 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:HD Graphics 630 orGeForce MX350
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile20.8+63%
Radeon RX 560X Mobile20.3+59%
Radeon 660M15.3+20%
GeForce MX35012.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:HD Graphics 630 orGeForce MX350
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
HD Graphics 630
1,7292% of 104,598
GeForce MX350257% better
6,1666% of 104,598

The GeForce MX350 has 257% better performance than the HD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The HD Graphics 630 is ranked 385th with a score of 1,729, and the GeForce MX350 is ranked 227th with a score of 6,166.

Performance per dollar
HD Graphics 630
No data available
GeForce MX350
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 630 and the GeForce MX350 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:HD Graphics 630 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:HD Graphics 630 orGeForce MX350
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
368
1,335.5
(+262.91%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
425
1,491
(+250.82%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
9,715
24,744
(+154.7%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1,067
4,371
(+309.65%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
17,916
3DMark 11 Performance Score
1,975
6,376
(+222.84%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
51.7
110
(+112.77%)
PassMark G3D Mark
1,109
2,805
(+152.93%)
PassMark G2D Mark
266
(+11.76%)
238
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
18.8
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
20.7
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
CodenameKaby Lake GT2GP107S
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5Pascal
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors--3,300 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
Memory SizeSystem Shared2 GB
Memory TypeSystem SharedGDDR5
Memory BandwidthSystem Dependent56.06 Gb/s
Memory ClockSystem Shared1,752 MHz
Memory InterfaceSystem Shared64 bit
L1 Cache--48 KB
L2 Cache--512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
Bus InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W20 W
OutputsMotherboard DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
Shading Units192--
CUDA Cores--640
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--5
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)2432
Render Output Units (ROP)316
Core Clock Speed350 MHz1,354 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,000 MHz1,468 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
Pixel Fill Rate3 GPixel/s23.49 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate24 GTexel/s46.98 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance384 GFLOPS1.88 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance96 GFLOPS58.72 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecHD Graphics 630GeForce MX350
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.46.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.