Intel HD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH has 727% better performance than the HD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 630 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel HD Graphics 630 GPU
The Intel HD Graphics 630 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2016. It is built on the Generation 9.5 GPU microarchitecture (codename Kaby Lake GT2) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The HD Graphics 630 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD Graphics 630 includes 192 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 3 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD Graphics 630 has the 385th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.65% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH GPU
The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The RX Vega M GH has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 204.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX Vega M GH includes 1,536 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,063 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,190 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 96 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 100 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RX Vega M GH has the 150th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Integrated |
| Release Date | Q3 2016 | Q1 2018 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6) | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 39 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 30 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 23 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 23 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 4 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon 780M | 15.8 | +295% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) | 6.7 | +68% |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) | 6.06 | +51% |
| Radeon RX Vega M GH | 4 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GH has 727% better performance than the HD Graphics 630 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The HD Graphics 630 is ranked 385th with a score of 1,729, and the Radeon RX Vega M GH is ranked 150th with a score of 14,302.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 630 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon 890M | 14,646.5 | +747% |
| Radeon RX Vega M GH | 14,302 | +727% |
| Radeon 780M | 12,624.5 | +630% |
| Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | 10,020 | +480% |
| Radeon RX Vega M GL | 9,862 | +470% |
| UHD Graphics 620 | 1,744 | +1% |
| Radeon R7 (Kaveri) | 1,734 | +0% |
| HD Graphics 630 | 1,729 | |
| Radeon RX Vega 3 | 1,723.5 | -0% |
| Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) | 1,720 | -1% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 368 | 2,908 (+690.22%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 425 | 2,999 (+605.65%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 9,715 | 59,162 (+508.98%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 1,067 | 10,248 (+860.45%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 1,975 | 13,212 (+568.96%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 51.7 | 144 (+178.53%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 1,109 | 6,573 (+492.7%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 266 | 778 (+192.48%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 18.8 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 20.7 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Polaris 22 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 5,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 204.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 800 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 1,024 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 100 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 1,536 |
| Shading Units | 192 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 24 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 24 | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 3 | 64 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 1,063 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,000 MHz | 1,190 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 3 GPixel/s | 76.16 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 24 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 384 GFLOPS | 3.66 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 96 GFLOPS | 228.5 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.