Intel HD Graphics 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550
The GeForce MX550 has 1,081% better performance than the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 510 and the GeForce MX550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel HD Graphics 510 GPU
The Intel HD Graphics 510 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT1) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The HD Graphics 510 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The HD Graphics 510 includes 96 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 350 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 950 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 12 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 2 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The HD Graphics 510 has the 474th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117SB) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The MX550 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX550 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,065 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,320 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX550 has the 177th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.57% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Integrated | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q4 2021 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
EA Sports F1 22 | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 59 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 51 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 41 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 28 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs. | ||
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce MX550 has 1,081% better performance than the HD Graphics 510 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The HD Graphics 510 is ranked 474th with a score of 847, and the GeForce MX550 is ranked 177th with a score of 10,005.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the HD Graphics 510 and the GeForce MX550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| T600 Mobile | 10,498 | +1,139% |
| Quadro M4000M | 10,259 | +1,111% |
| GeForce MX550 | 10,005 | +1,081% |
| GeForce GTX 970M | 9,877.5 | +1,066% |
| FirePro W7170M | 9,708 | +1,046% |
| UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake, 16EU) | 854 | +1% |
| Radeon HD 8470D | 854 | +1% |
| HD Graphics 510 | 847 | |
| Radeon R5 (Beema) | 764 | -10% |
| HD Graphics 4400 | 735.5 | -13% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | -- | 2,470 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | -- | 2,800 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 5,664 | 40,364 (+612.64%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 621 | 6,125.5 (+886.39%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 985 | 10,319.5 (+947.66%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 28 | 173.5 (+519.64%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 627 | 4,544 (+624.72%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 163 | 399 (+144.79%) |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | 9.3 | -- |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | 10.8 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Skylake GT1 | TU117SB |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | System Shared | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 96 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | System Shared | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 W | 25 W |
| Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 96 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 1,024 |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 12 | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 2 | 16 |
| Core Clock Speed | 350 MHz | 1,065 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 950 MHz | 1,320 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 1.9 GPixel/s | 21.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 11.4 GTexel/s | 42.24 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 182.4 GFLOPS | 2.7 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 45.6 GFLOPS | 42.24 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | HD Graphics 510 | GeForce MX550 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.