PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

Intel
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Arc A770395% better
41,30339% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,937

The Arc A770 has 395% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A770139% better
125.5478% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45

The Arc A770 has 139% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop GeForce GTX 950
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A770 GPU

The Arc A770 is a desktop graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q4 2022 with a suggested retail price of $329. Its DG2-512 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.7 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 2,000 MHz memory clock and 256 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 512 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The Arc A770 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.0 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 225 W. Intel recommends using a power supply of at least 550 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The Arc A770 has the 36th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 39.36% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 41,303 score and $329 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 125.54. This is the 6th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 GPU

The GeForce GTX 950 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q3 2015 with a suggested retail price of $159. Its GM206 chip that powers the GPU uses the Maxwell 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM. Its 1,653 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 105.8 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

The GTX 950 is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 90 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 250 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

The GeForce GTX 950 has the 196th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,351 score and $159 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 52.52. This is the 63rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A770GeForce GTX 950
ManufacturerIntelNVIDIA
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Maxwell 2.0
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ4 2022Q3 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$329$159
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Arc A770GeForce GTX 950
Low - 1080p
284 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
241 FPS
--
High - 1080p
181 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
62 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
42 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
21 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A770 orGeForce GTX 950

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A770 orGeForce GTX 950
GPUCost Per Frame
Radeon RX 57008.35-46%
Arc A77015.52
Arc A75017.2+11%
Radeon RX 7800 XT17.39+12%
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti17.97+16%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti21.24+37%
Radeon RX 680028.11+81%
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER28.71+85%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER29.35+89%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A770395% better
41,30339% of 104,937
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,937

The Arc A770 has 395% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A770 is ranked 36th with a score of 41,303, and the GeForce GTX 950 is ranked 196th with a score of 8,351.

Performance per dollar
Arc A770139% better
125.5478% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45

The Arc A770 has 139% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A770 is ranked 6th with a performance per dollar of 125.54, and the GeForce GTX 950 is ranked 63rd with a performance per dollar of 52.52.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A770 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB)43,112+4%
GeForce RTX 307043,005+4%
Arc A77041,303
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER40,963-1%
GeForce RTX 208040,278-2%
Radeon R7 3708,518.5-79%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti8,415-80%
GeForce GTX 9508,351-80%
GeForce GTX 7607,962-81%
Radeon HD 79707,770-81%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A770 or
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce RTX 4060127.73+2%
Radeon RX 7700 XT127.71+2%
Arc A770125.54
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB)119.81-5%
Radeon RX 5500 XT115.38-8%
Radeon R7 37057.17-54%
GeForce GTX 96054.11-57%
GeForce GTX 95052.52-58%
GeForce GTX 97048.73-61%
Radeon R9 390X41.83-67%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A770GeForce GTX 950
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
13,953
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
14,047
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
139,166
(+271.57%)
37,454
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
32,666
(+426.23%)
6,207.5
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
131,749
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
35,386
(+315.33%)
8,520
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
96.6
PassMark G3D Mark
13,119
(+145.77%)
5,338
PassMark G2D Mark
747
(+16.72%)
640
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
CodenameDG2-512GM206
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Maxwell 2.0
Process Size6 nm28 nm
Transistors21,700 million2,940 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
Memory Size16 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/s105.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,000 MHz1,653 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--48 KB
L2 Cache16 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
Slots2 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)225 W90 W
Suggested PSU550 W250 W
Power Connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin
OutputsHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.0DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
Shading Units4,096--
CUDA Cores--768
Execution Units (EU)4,096--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25648
Render Output Units (ROP)12832
Tensor Cores512--
Ray Tracing Cores32--
Core Clock Speed2,100 MHz1,024 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,400 MHz1,188 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
Pixel Fill Rate307.2 GPixel/s38.02 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate614.4 GTexel/s57.02 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance19.66 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--57.02 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A770GeForce GTX 950
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.