Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Arc A730M136% better
29,14428% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12,34012% of 104,598
The Arc A730M has 136% better performance than the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Arc A730M
No data available
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A730M and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Arc A730M
Shop GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the Intel Arc A730M GPU
The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile graphics card that launched in 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-512) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Arc A730M includes 3,072 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,100 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 192 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 384 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 24 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A730M has the 79th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.86% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2021. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 2050 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 2050 Mobile includes 2,048 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 735 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,245 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 64 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 32 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 30 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 2050 Mobile has the 158th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | 2022 | Q4 2021 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Black Myth: Wukong
Once Human
The First Descendant
F1 24
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Ghost of Tsushima
Dragon's Dogma 2
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Black Myth: Wukong | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 44 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 34 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 26 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 15 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 9 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 4 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 11 | +175% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 10 | +150% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 6 | +50% |
| Arc A730M | 4 | |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Arc A730M136% better
29,14428% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
12,34012% of 104,598
The Arc A730M has 136% better performance than the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Arc A730M is ranked 79th with a score of 29,144, and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is ranked 158th with a score of 12,340.
Performance per dollar
Arc A730M
No data available
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
No data available
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A730M and the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-Q | 29,636.5 | +2% |
| RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile | 29,411 | +1% |
| Arc A730M | 29,144 | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | 29,092.5 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | 28,526.5 | -2% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 13,131.5 | -55% |
| GeForce GTX 980M | 12,517 | -57% |
| GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 12,340 | -58% |
| Radeon Pro Vega 20 | 12,289 | -58% |
| Quadro P3000 | 12,105 | -58% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,813 (+175.49%) | 3,199 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,919.5 (+154.41%) | 3,506 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 83,396 (+43.15%) | 58,256.5 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 21,294 (+138.03%) | 8,946 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 24,285.5 (+94.72%) | 12,472 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 196.4 (+21.38%) | 161.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 10,488 (+37.01%) | 7,655 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 673 (+43.19%) | 470 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA107 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 21,700 million | 8,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 Gb/s | 112 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 192 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 30 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | DVI, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 3,072 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,048 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 3,072 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 192 | 64 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 96 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 64 |
| Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) | 384 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 32 |
| Ray Tracing Units (RTU) | 24 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,100 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,050 MHz | 1,245 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 196.8 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 393.6 GTexel/s | 79.68 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 12.6 TFLOPS | 5.1 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 159.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XTNVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Max-QNVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
vs
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XTNVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 MobileNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.