PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Arc A730M vs Intel Arc A370M

Intel
VS
Intel
Performance
Arc A730M141% better
29,14428% of 104,737
Arc A370M
12,089.512% of 104,737

The Arc A730M has 141% better performance than the Arc A370M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A730M
No data available
Arc A370M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A730M and the Arc A370M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Arc A730M
Shop Arc A370M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A730M GPU

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile graphics card that launched in 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-512) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A730M has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 336 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A730M includes 3,072 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,100 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 192 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 96 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 384 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 24 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 80 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A730M has the 79th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.83% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Arc A370M GPU

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A370M includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,550 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A370M has the 162nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.54% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A730MArc A370M
ManufacturerIntelIntel
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Generation 12.7
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release Date2022Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Arc A730MArc A370M
Low - 1080p
86 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
56 FPS
--
High - 1080p
46 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
39 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
27 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orArc A370M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orArc A370M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A730M141% better
29,14428% of 104,737
Arc A370M
12,089.512% of 104,737

The Arc A730M has 141% better performance than the Arc A370M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A730M is ranked 79th with a score of 29,144, and the Arc A370M is ranked 162nd with a score of 12,089.5.

Performance per dollar
Arc A730M
No data available
Arc A370M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A730M and the Arc A370M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A730M orArc A370M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A730MArc A370M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
8,813
(+126.85%)
3,885
3DMark Time Spy Score
8,919.5
(+109.62%)
4,255
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
83,396
(+134.23%)
35,604
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
21,294
(+161.31%)
8,149
3DMark 11 Performance Score
24,285.5
(+93.97%)
12,520.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
196.4
(+52.13%)
129.1
PassMark G3D Mark
10,488
(+105.04%)
5,115
PassMark G2D Mark
683
734
(+7.47%)
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
CodenameDG2-512DG2-128
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Generation 12.7
Process Size6 nm6 nm
Transistors21,700 million7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
Memory Size12 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth336 Gb/s112 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface192 bit64 bit
L1 Cache4.5 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache12 MB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)80 W35 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
Shading Units3,0721,024
Execution Units (EU)3,0728
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)19264
Render Output Units (ROP)9632
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)384128
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)248
Core Clock Speed1,100 MHz1,550 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,050 MHz2,050 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
Pixel Fill Rate196.8 GPixel/s65.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate393.6 GTexel/s131.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance12.6 TFLOPS4.2 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--1,050 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A730MArc A370M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.