Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 has 44% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Arc A380 has 110% better value for the money than the RTX A2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Arc A380 GPU
The Intel Arc A380 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,937 MHz memory clock and a 96 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 186 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
About the NVIDIA RTX A2000 GPU
The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2021 with a MSRP of $449. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA106) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX A2000 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 192 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 288 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX A2000 includes 3,328 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 562 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 104 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 48 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 104 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 26 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RTX A2000 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 70 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RTX A2000 has the 111th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.39% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 19,978 score and $449 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 44.49. This is the 67th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release Date | Q2 2022 | Q3 2021 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $149 | $449 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Black Myth: Wukong | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 45 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 34 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 13 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 10 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 10 | |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 10 | +0% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 44.9 | |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.9 | +0% |
Benchmark Performance
The RTX A2000 has 44% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
RTX A2000's 13,892 performance score ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
The Arc A380 has 110% better value for the money than the RTX A2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
RTX A2000's 93.23 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 44,404 | +220% |
| Quadro P5000 | 20,096 | +45% |
| RTX A2000 | 19,978 | +44% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | +44% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +15% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +12% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | +11% |
| Arc A380 | 13,892 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | -2% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -12% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.18 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.98 | +3% |
| Arc A380 | 93.23 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | -2% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | -10% |
| RTX A2000 | 44.49 | -52% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | -52% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | -77% |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -79% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -80% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,915 | 5,675 (+44.96%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4,457 | 6,282 (+40.95%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 60,804 | 94,407 (+55.26%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 10,174 | 14,934 (+46.79%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 46,613 | 68,223 (+46.36%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 15,095 | 20,964 (+38.88%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 371.8 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,253 | 13,746 (+119.83%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 611 | 985 (+61.21%) |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA106 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 7,200 million | 12,000 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 186 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,937 MHz | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 96 bit | 192 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 3 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 70 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | -- | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | -- | 3,328 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 1,024 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 26 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 104 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 104 |
| Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) | 128 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 26 |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,000 MHz | 562 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,200 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | -- | 57.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | -- | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 4,194 TFLOPS | 7.99 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 124.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Arc A380 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.