Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
The Arc A380 has 2% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Arc A380 has 2% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Arc A380 GPU
The Intel Arc A380 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,937 MHz memory clock and a 96 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 186 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2019 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 1650 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 1650 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,485 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,665 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 1650 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 1650 has the 149th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.51% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 13,645 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 91.58. This is the 24th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q2 2022 | Q2 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $149 | $149 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 109 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 91 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 64 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 16 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A380 | 16.3 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 10.4 | -36% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A380 | 9.14 | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 19.13 | +109% |
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A380 has 2% better performance than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
GeForce GTX 1650's 13,892 performance score ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
The Arc A380 has 2% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 1650 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
GeForce GTX 1650's 93.23 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | +24% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | +16% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | +15% |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 15,619 | +12% |
| Arc A380 | 13,892 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 13,645 | -2% |
| Radeon R9 380 | 12,191 | -12% |
| Radeon R9 280X | 10,792 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 10,767.5 | -22% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 10,216.5 | -26% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 570 | 112.23 | +20% |
| Radeon RX 470 | 98.46 | +6% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 96.18 | +3% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | 95.98 | +3% |
| Arc A380 | 93.23 | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 91.58 | -2% |
| Radeon RX 590 | 83.74 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 82.05 | -12% |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | 78.63 | -16% |
| Radeon RX 480 | 78.25 | -16% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,915 (+11.47%) | 3,512 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4,457 (+14.9%) | 3,879 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 60,804 (+20.29%) | 50,549 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 10,174 (+10.55%) | 9,203 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 46,613 (+5.81%) | 44,051.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 15,095 (+8.64%) | 13,894 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 174.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 6,253 | 7,874 (+25.92%) |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 611 (+5.34%) | 580 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | DG2-128 | TU117 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 7,200 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 186 Gb/s | 128.1 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,937 MHz | 2,001 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 96 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | -- | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| CUDA Cores | -- | 896 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 1,024 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 14 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 64 | 56 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 32 | 32 |
| Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) | 128 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 2,000 MHz | 1,485 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,665 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | -- | 53.28 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | -- | 93.24 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 4,194 TFLOPS | 2.98 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 93.24 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Arc A380 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.