PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
Arc A380
13,89211% of 129,772
Radeon R9 Nano24% better
17,28213% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 24% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A380250% better
93.2356% of 165.13
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13

The Arc A380 has 250% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A380 GPU

The Intel Arc A380 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,937 MHz memory clock and a 96 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 186 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Arc A380 has the 168th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.70% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 13,892 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 93.23. This is the 32nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 150th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 566 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 92nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7GCN 3.0
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ2 2022Q3 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$149$649
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Arc A380Radeon R9 Nano
Low - 1080p
109 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
91 FPS
--
High - 1080p
64 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
16 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A380 orRadeon R9 Nano
GPUFrames Per Second
Arc A75056.5+247%
Arc A38016.3
Radeon RX 6500 XT10.4-36%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A380 orRadeon R9 Nano
GPUCost Per Frame
Arc A7505.12-44%
Arc A3809.14
Radeon RX 6500 XT19.13+109%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A380
13,89211% of 129,772
Radeon R9 Nano24% better
17,28213% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 24% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A380 is ranked 168th with a score of 13,892, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 150th with a score of 17,282.

Performance per dollar
Arc A380250% better
93.2356% of 165.13
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13

The Arc A380 has 250% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A380 is ranked 32nd with a performance per dollar of 93.23, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 92nd with a performance per dollar of 26.63.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A380 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 98017,604.5+27%
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+26%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+25%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282+24%
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5+16%
GeForce GTX 97016,033+15%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti15,619+12%
Arc A38013,892
GeForce GTX 165013,645-2%
Radeon R9 38012,191-12%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A380 or
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 166096.18+3%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER95.98+3%
Arc A38093.23
GeForce GTX 165091.58-2%
Radeon RX 59083.74-10%
Radeon R9 290X29.45-68%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14-70%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63-71%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-76%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-78%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,915
4,511
(+15.22%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,457
4,556
(+2.22%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
60,804
81,374
(+33.83%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
10,174
14,362
(+41.16%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
46,613
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
15,095
(+2.04%)
14,793
PassMark G3D Mark
6,253
--
PassMark G2D Mark
611
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
CodenameDG2-128Fiji
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7GCN 3.0
Process Size6 nm28 nm
Transistors7,200 million8,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
Memory Size6 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM
Memory Bandwidth186 Gb/s512 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,937 MHz500 MHz
Memory Interface96 bit4,096 bit
L1 Cache--16 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
Slots--2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)75 W175 W
Suggested PSU--450 W
Power Connectors--1x 8-pin
Outputs--HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
Stream Processors (SP)--4,096
Compute Units (CU)--64
Execution Units (EU)1,024--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)64256
Render Output Units (ROP)3264
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)128--
Core Clock Speed2,000 MHz1,000 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
Pixel Fill Rate--64 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--256 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4,194 TFLOPS8.19 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--512 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A380Radeon R9 Nano
DirectX1212 (12_0)
OpenCL3.02.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.