PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Arc A370M vs AMD Radeon 680M

Intel
VS
AMD
Performance
Arc A370M16% better
12,089.512% of 104,937
Radeon 680M
10,39910% of 104,937

The Arc A370M has 16% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A370M
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A370M and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Arc A370M
Shop Radeon 680M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A370M GPU

The Arc A370M is a mobile graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q1 2022. Its DG2-128 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.7 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

Memory

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 112 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

Compatibility

This mobile card has a TDP of 35 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A370M has the 159th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU

The Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2022. Its Rembrandt chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

Compatibility

This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.

Benchmark Performance

The Radeon 680M has the 173rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A370MRadeon 680M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7RDNA 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q1 2022
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Arc A370MRadeon 680M
Low - 1080p
28 FPS
34 FPS(+22.1%)
Medium - 1080p
17 FPS
25 FPS(+43.1%)
High - 1080p
12 FPS
24 FPS(+105.22%)
Ultra - 1080p
11 FPS
23 FPS(+104.39%)
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M or
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile)33+189%
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile30.1+164%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile28.9+154%
Radeon 680M23.3+104%
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)20.2+77%
Radeon 660M14.8+30%
Arc A370M11.4

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M orRadeon 680M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A370M16% better
12,089.512% of 104,937
Radeon 680M
10,39910% of 104,937

The Arc A370M has 16% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A370M is ranked 159th with a score of 12,089.5, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,399.

Performance per dollar
Arc A370M
No data available
Radeon 680M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A370M and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile)12,267.5+1%
Quadro P300012,105+0%
Arc A370M12,089.5
Quadro M5000M11,845-2%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q11,538-5%
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569-13%
T600 Mobile10,498-13%
Radeon 680M10,399-14%
Quadro M4000M10,259-15%
GeForce MX55010,005-17%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M orRadeon 680M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A370MRadeon 680M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,885
(+67.96%)
2,313
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,255
(+64%)
2,594.5
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35,604
43,250
(+21.48%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8,149
(+18.7%)
6,865
3DMark 11 Performance Score
12,520.5
(+20.66%)
10,377
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.1
145
(+12.32%)
PassMark G3D Mark
5,115
--
PassMark G2D Mark
714
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
CodenameDG2-128Rembrandt
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7RDNA 2.0
Process Size6 nm6 nm
Transistors7,200 million13,100 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeGDDR6System Shared
Memory Bandwidth112 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock1,750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface64 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache1.5 MB128 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W50 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
Stream Processors (SP)--768
Shading Units1,024--
Compute Units (CU)--12
Execution Units (EU)8--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6448
Render Output Units (ROP)3232
Tensor Cores128--
Ray Tracing Cores812
Core Clock Speed1,550 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,050 MHz2,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
Pixel Fill Rate65.6 GPixel/s70.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate131.2 GTexel/s105.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.2 TFLOPS3.38 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance1,050 GFLOPS211.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A370MRadeon 680M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL3.02.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.