Intel Arc A370M vs AMD FirePro W4170M

VS
Performance
Arc A370M422% better
12,089.512% of 104,598
FirePro W4170M
2,3152% of 104,598

The Arc A370M has 422% better performance than the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A370M
No data available
FirePro W4170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A370M and the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Arc A370M
Shop FirePro W4170M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A370M GPU

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A370M includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,550 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc A370M has the 162nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 11.56% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD FirePro W4170M GPU

The AMD FirePro W4170M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2014. It is built on the GCN 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Mars) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The FirePro W4170M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 64 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The FirePro W4170M includes 384 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 825 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 900 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Benchmark Performance

The FirePro W4170M has the 342nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.21% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A370MFirePro W4170M
ManufacturerIntelAMD
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7GCN 1.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q2 2014
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Diablo 4
Diablo 4
Display FPS for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Display FPS for Resident Evil 4 (Remake)
Resident Evil 4 (Remake)
Display FPS for Company of Heroes 3
Company of Heroes 3
Display FPS for Atomic Heart
Atomic Heart

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Arc A370MFirePro W4170M
Low - 1080p
28 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
17 FPS
--
High - 1080p
12 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
11 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M orFirePro W4170M
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile33.3+192%
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile33+189%
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile30.1+164%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile28.9+154%
Radeon 680M23.3+104%
Arc A370M11.4

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M orFirePro W4170M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A370M422% better
12,089.512% of 104,598
FirePro W4170M
2,3152% of 104,598

The Arc A370M has 422% better performance than the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A370M is ranked 162nd with a score of 12,089.5, and the FirePro W4170M is ranked 342nd with a score of 2,315.

Performance per dollar
Arc A370M
No data available
FirePro W4170M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A370M and the FirePro W4170M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon Pro Vega 2012,289+2%
Quadro P300012,105+0%
Arc A370M12,089.5
Quadro M5000M11,845-2%
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q11,538-5%
GeForce 840M2,340-81%
Radeon 5302,327-81%
FirePro W4170M2,315-81%
GeForce GT 745M2,249-81%
Radeon R7 M4402,245-81%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A370M orFirePro W4170M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A370MFirePro W4170M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,885
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,255
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35,604
(+184.7%)
12,506
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8,149
(+361.44%)
1,766
3DMark 11 Performance Score
12,520.5
(+376.25%)
2,629
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
129.1
(+136.01%)
54.7
PassMark G3D Mark
5,115
(+395.16%)
1,033
PassMark G2D Mark
714
(+236.79%)
212
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
22.4
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
17.6
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
CodenameDG2-128Mars
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7GCN 1.0
Process Size6 nm28 nm
Transistors7,200 million950 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth112 Gb/s64 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,000 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit128 bit
L1 Cache1.5 MB16 KB
L2 Cache4 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)35 W--
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
Stream Processors (SP)--384
Shading Units1,024--
Compute Units (CU)--6
Execution Units (EU)8--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)6424
Render Output Units (ROP)328
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)128--
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)8--
Core Clock Speed1,550 MHz825 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,050 MHz900 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
Pixel Fill Rate65.6 GPixel/s7.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate131.2 GTexel/s21.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.2 TFLOPS691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance1,050 GFLOPS43.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A370MFirePro W4170M
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.5 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.