PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450

Intel
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Arc A350M30% better
10,73010% of 104,937
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,937

The Arc A350M has 30% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Arc A350M
No data available
GeForce MX450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A350M and the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Arc A350M
Shop GeForce MX450
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the Intel Arc A350M GPU

The Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q1 2022. Its DG2-128 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.7 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 112 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 25 W.

The Arc A350M has the 170th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce MX450 GPU

The GeForce MX450 is a mobile graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q3 2020. Its TU117S chip that powers the GPU uses the Turing architecture and is fabricated on the 12 nm process.

This GPU is paired with 2 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,250 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 80 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.

This mobile card has a TDP of 31 W.

The GeForce MX450 has the 199th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.86% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoArc A350MGeForce MX450
ManufacturerIntelNVIDIA
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Turing
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q3 2020
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Skull & Bones
Skull & Bones
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
More games to choose from
More Games

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Arc A350MGeForce MX450
Low - 1080p
--
32 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
26 FPS
High - 1080p
--
20 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
13 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A350M orGeForce MX450
GPUFrames Per Second
Our database does not have enough FPS data to compare with other GPUs.

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A350M orGeForce MX450
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Arc A350M30% better
10,73010% of 104,937
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,937

The Arc A350M has 30% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Arc A350M is ranked 170th with a score of 10,730, and the GeForce MX450 is ranked 199th with a score of 8,250.

Performance per dollar
Arc A350M
No data available
GeForce MX450
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A350M and the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A350M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q11,082.5+3%
RTX A500 (Mobile)10,748+0%
Arc A350M10,730
Radeon Pro Vega 1610,569-2%
T600 Mobile10,498-2%
Radeon RX 560 (Mobile)8,329-22%
Quadro M3000M8,288.5-23%
GeForce MX4508,250-23%
Iris Xe MAX8,214-23%
Radeon RX 560X (Mobile)8,211.5-23%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Arc A350M orGeForce MX450
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkArc A350MGeForce MX450
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3,050
(+60.53%)
1,900
3DMark Time Spy Score
3,397
(+61.84%)
2,099
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
36,314.5
(+31.72%)
27,570
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,147
(+51.26%)
4,725
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
20,743.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
10,766
(+33.44%)
8,068
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
149.3
(+14.85%)
130
PassMark G3D Mark
--
3,734
PassMark G2D Mark
--
304
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
57.2
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
53.9
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
CodenameDG2-128TU117S
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Turing
Process Size6 nm12 nm
Transistors7,200 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth112 Gb/s80 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,250 MHz
Memory Interface64 bit64 bit
L1 Cache1.1 MB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB512 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Thermal Design Power (TDP)25 W31 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
Shading Units768--
CUDA Cores--896
Execution Units (EU)6--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--14
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)4856
Render Output Units (ROP)2432
Tensor Cores96--
Ray Tracing Cores6--
Core Clock Speed1,150 MHz1,395 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,200 MHz1,575 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
Pixel Fill Rate52.8 GPixel/s50.4 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate105.6 GTexel/s88.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance3.38 TFLOPS2.82 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance844.8 GFLOPS88.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecArc A350MGeForce MX450
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
OpenCL3.03.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.66.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.