Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon 680M
The Arc A350M has 3% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A350M and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the Intel Arc A350M GPU
The Arc A350M is a mobile graphics card by Intel. It launched in Q1 2022. Its DG2-128 chip that powers the GPU uses the Generation 12.7 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 1,750 MHz memory clock and 64 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 112 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 25 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A350M has the 170th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.23% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD Radeon 680M GPU
The Radeon 680M is a mobile graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q1 2022. Its Rembrandt chip that powers the GPU uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 6 nm process.
Compatibility
This mobile card has a TDP of 50 W.
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon 680M has the 173rd highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2022 | Q1 2022 |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 34 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 25 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 24 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 23 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2050 (Mobile) | 33 | +42% |
| Radeon 680M | 23.3 | |
| Radeon RX 560X (Mobile) | 20.2 | -13% |
| Radeon 660M | 14.8 | -36% |
| Arc A370M | 11.4 | -51% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Arc A350M has 3% better performance than the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Arc A350M is ranked 170th with a score of 10,730, and the Radeon 680M is ranked 173rd with a score of 10,399.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Arc A350M and the Radeon 680M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon HD 7970M X2 | 11,119 | +4% |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 11,082.5 | +3% |
| RTX A500 (Mobile) | 10,748 | +0% |
| Arc A350M | 10,730 | |
| Radeon Pro Vega 16 | 10,569 | -2% |
| T600 Mobile | 10,498 | -2% |
| Radeon 680M | 10,399 | -3% |
| Quadro M4000M | 10,259 | -4% |
| GeForce MX550 | 10,005 | -7% |
| GeForce GTX 970M | 9,877.5 | -8% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 3,050 (+31.86%) | 2,313 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3,397 (+30.93%) | 2,594.5 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 36,314.5 | 43,250 (+19.1%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 7,147 (+4.11%) | 6,865 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 10,766 (+3.75%) | 10,377 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 149.3 (+2.97%) | 145 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | DG2-128 | Rembrandt |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistors | 7,200 million | 13,100 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | System Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 Gb/s | System Dependent |
| Memory Clock | 1,750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory Interface | 64 bit | System Shared |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 W | 50 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | -- | 768 |
| Shading Units | 768 | -- |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 12 |
| Execution Units (EU) | 6 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 48 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 24 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | -- |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 6 | 12 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,150 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,200 MHz | 2,200 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 52.8 GPixel/s | 70.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 105.6 GTexel/s | 105.6 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 3.38 TFLOPS | 3.38 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | 211.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Arc A350M | Radeon 680M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.