Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon VII2,361% better
37,88136% of 104,737
Quadro 3000M
1,5391% of 104,737
The Radeon VII has 2,361% better performance than the Quadro 3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon VII
54.1934% of 161.45
Quadro 3000M
No data available
The Radeon VII has 34% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon VII
Shop Quadro 3000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon VII GPU
The AMD Radeon VII is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2019 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the GCN 5.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 20) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The VII has 16 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 1.02 Tb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The VII includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,400 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,750 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The VII occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 295 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The VII has the 46th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 36.17% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 37,881 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 54.19. This is the 60th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M GPU
The NVIDIA Quadro 3000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q1 2011. It is built on the Fermi GPU microarchitecture (codename GF104) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The 3000M has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 625 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The 3000M includes 240 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 450 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The 3000M has the 406th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 1.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Fermi |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2019 | Q1 2011 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $699 | -- |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Crysis Remastered
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
DIRT 5
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Crysis Remastered | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 230 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 152 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 80 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 64 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 49 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 31 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII orQuadro 3000M
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 54.4 | +77% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 49.2 | +60% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 44.4 | +45% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 38.9 | +27% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 37.6 | +22% |
| Radeon VII | 30.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 30.6 | +-0% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 30 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 28.5 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 28.4 | -7% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII orQuadro 3000M
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 17.51 | -23% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 19.3 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 19.83 | -13% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 21.32 | -6% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 22.28 | -2% |
| Radeon VII | 22.77 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 22.84 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 24.29 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 24.61 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 24.92 | +9% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon VII2,361% better
37,88136% of 104,737
Quadro 3000M
1,5391% of 104,737
The Radeon VII has 2,361% better performance than the Quadro 3000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon VII is ranked 46th with a score of 37,881, and the Quadro 3000M is ranked 406th with a score of 1,539.
Performance per dollar
Radeon VII
54.1934% of 161.45
Quadro 3000M
No data available
The Radeon VII has 83% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon VII's 54.19 performance per dollar ranks it 60th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 38,191 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 37,941 | +0% |
| Radeon VII | 37,881 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | -1% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | -2% |
| Radeon HD 8690M | 1,600 | -96% |
| Radeon R5 M240 | 1,588 | -96% |
| Quadro 3000M | 1,539 | -96% |
| Radeon HD 7730M | 1,478 | -96% |
| Radeon HD 6850M | 1,469.5 | -96% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII orQuadro 3000M
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 62.65 | +16% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 61.77 | +14% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | +8% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 58.2 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +6% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 53.89 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | -13% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,779.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,985 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 146,094 | -- |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 27,448.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 101,955 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 26,565 (+1,424.97%) | 1,742 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 16,697 (+1,579.78%) | 994 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 779 (+148.09%) | 314 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Vega 20 | GF104 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Fermi |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 13,230 million | 1,950 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1.02 Tb/s | 80 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 4,096 bit | 256 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 3,840 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 240 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 60 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 5 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 240 | 40 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,400 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,750 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 112 GPixel/s | 4.5 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 420 GTexel/s | 18 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 13.44 TFLOPS | 432 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 3.36 TFLOPS | 36 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon VII | Quadro 3000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.