Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon VII354% better
37,88136% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,598
The Radeon VII has 354% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon VII3% better
54.1934% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45
The Radeon VII has 3% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Shop Radeon VII
Shop GeForce GTX 950
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon VII GPU
The AMD Radeon VII is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q1 2019 with a MSRP of $699. It is built on the GCN 5.1 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 20) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The VII has 16 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 1,000 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 1.02 Tb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The VII includes 3,840 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,400 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,750 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 240 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The VII occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 295 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The VII has the 46th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 36.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 37,881 score and $699 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 54.19. This is the 60th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $159. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The GTX 950 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,653 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 105.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The GTX 950 includes 768 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,024 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,188 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GTX 950 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 90 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GTX 950 has the 199th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.98% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 8,351 score and $159 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 52.52. This is the 63rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q1 2019 | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $699 | $159 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Crysis Remastered
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.0)
Immortals Fenyx Rising
Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
Yakuza: Like a Dragon
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
DIRT 5
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Crysis Remastered | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 720p | 230 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 152 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 80 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 64 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 49 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 31 FPS | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII orGeForce GTX 950
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 54.4 | +77% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 49.2 | +60% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 44.4 | +45% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 38.9 | +27% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 37.6 | +22% |
| Radeon VII | 30.7 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 30.6 | +-0% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 30 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 28.5 | -7% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 28.4 | -7% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII orGeForce GTX 950
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 17.51 | -23% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 19.3 | -15% |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 19.83 | -13% |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | 21.32 | -6% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 22.28 | -2% |
| Radeon VII | 22.77 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 22.84 | +0% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 24.29 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 24.61 | +8% |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 24.92 | +9% |
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon VII354% better
37,88136% of 104,598
GeForce GTX 950
8,3518% of 104,598
The Radeon VII has 354% better performance than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon VII is ranked 46th with a score of 37,881, and the GeForce GTX 950 is ranked 199th with a score of 8,351.
Performance per dollar
Radeon VII3% better
54.1934% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 950
52.5233% of 161.45
The Radeon VII has 3% better value for the money than the GeForce GTX 950 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon VII is ranked 60th with a performance per dollar of 54.19, and the GeForce GTX 950 is ranked 63rd with a performance per dollar of 52.52.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 38,191 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 37,941 | +0% |
| Radeon VII | 37,881 | |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 37,671.5 | -1% |
| Arc A750 | 37,288 | -2% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 8,518.5 | -78% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 8,415 | -78% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 8,351 | -78% |
| GeForce GTX 760 | 7,962 | -79% |
| Radeon HD 7970 | 7,770 | -79% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon VII or
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | +8% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | +6% |
| Radeon R7 370 | 57.17 | +5% |
| Radeon VII | 54.19 | |
| GeForce GTX 960 | 54.11 | -0% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 53.89 | -1% |
| GeForce GTX 950 | 52.52 | -3% |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | 48.85 | -10% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 48.73 | -10% |
| Radeon R9 390X | 41.83 | -23% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 8,779.5 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8,985 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 146,094 (+290.06%) | 37,454 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 27,448.5 (+342.18%) | 6,207.5 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 101,955 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 26,565 (+211.8%) | 8,520 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 96.6 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 16,660 (+212.22%) | 5,336 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 773 (+21.92%) | 634 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Vega 20 | GM206 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 13,230 million | 2,940 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1.02 Tb/s | 105.8 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 1,000 MHz | 1,653 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 4,096 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 1,024 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 295 W | 90 W |
| Suggested PSU | 600 W | 250 W |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a | DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 3,840 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 768 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 60 | -- |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 240 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,400 MHz | 1,024 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 1,750 MHz | 1,188 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 112 GPixel/s | 38.02 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 420 GTexel/s | 57.02 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 13.44 TFLOPS | 1.83 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 3.36 TFLOPS | 57.02 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon VII | GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.