AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Intel Iris Graphics 550

VS
Performance
Radeon RX Vega M GL289% better
9,8629% of 104,598
Iris Graphics 550
2,533.52% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega M GL has 289% better performance than the Iris Graphics 550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Graphics 550
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX Vega M GL and the Iris Graphics 550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon RX Vega M GL
Shop Iris Graphics 550
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2018. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 22) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega M GL has 4 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 700 MHz memory clock and a 1,024 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 179.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega M GL includes 1,280 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 931 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,011 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX Vega M GL has the 182nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the Intel Iris Graphics 550 GPU

The Intel Iris Graphics 550 is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q3 2015. It is built on the Generation 9.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Skylake GT3e) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The Iris Graphics 550 has System Shared of memory. This gives it a memory bandwidth of System Dependent, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Iris Graphics 550 includes 384 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 48 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 6 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Iris Graphics 550 has the 325th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.42% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 9.0
Market SegmentIntegratedIntegrated
Release DateQ1 2018Q3 2015
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Doom Eternal
Doom Eternal
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Display FPS for Need for Speed Heat
NFS Heat
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2
Display FPS for Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Radeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
Low - 720p
173 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
58 FPS
--
High - 1080p
39 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
27 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
18 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
9 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega M GL orIris Graphics 550
GPUFrames Per Second
Radeon RX Vega M GH12.1+37%
Radeon RX Vega M GL8.8

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega M GL orIris Graphics 550
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX Vega M GL289% better
9,8629% of 104,598
Iris Graphics 550
2,533.52% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega M GL has 289% better performance than the Iris Graphics 550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is ranked 182nd with a score of 9,862, and the Iris Graphics 550 is ranked 325th with a score of 2,533.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega M GL
No data available
Iris Graphics 550
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX Vega M GL and the Iris Graphics 550 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega M GL or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega M GL orIris Graphics 550
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
2,072
(+274.01%)
554
3DMark Time Spy Score
2,225
(+258.87%)
620
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38,812
(+198.88%)
12,986
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7,329
(+347.44%)
1,638
3DMark 11 Performance Score
9,380
(+247.54%)
2,699
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
120.7
(+98.52%)
60.8
PassMark G3D Mark
3,764
(+166.95%)
1,410
PassMark G2D Mark
482
(+58.03%)
305
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
CodenamePolaris 22Skylake GT3e
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Generation 9.0
Process Size14 nm14 nm
Transistors5,000 million--

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeHBM2System Shared
Memory Bandwidth179.2 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface1,024 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache1,024 KB--

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
Bus InterfaceIGPRing Bus
Thermal Design Power (TDP)65 W15 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
Stream Processors (SP)1,280--
Shading Units--384
Compute Units (CU)20--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8048
Render Output Units (ROP)326
Core Clock Speed931 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,011 MHz1,000 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
Pixel Fill Rate32.35 GPixel/s6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate80.88 GTexel/s48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance2.59 TFLOPS768 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance161.8 GFLOPS192 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX Vega M GLIris Graphics 550
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.4

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.