AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

VS
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64128% better
30,823.529% of 104,737
Quadro T2000 Mobile
13,523.513% of 104,737

The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 128% better performance than the Quadro T2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 64
61.7738% of 161.45
Quadro T2000 Mobile
No data available

The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 38% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Radeon RX Vega 64
Shop Quadro T2000 Mobile
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2017 with a MSRP of $499. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 10) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega 64 has 8 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 945 MHz memory clock and a 2,048 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 483.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega 64 includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,247 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,546 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The RX Vega 64 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 600 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 295 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The RX Vega 64 has the 72nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 29.43% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 30,823.5 score and $499 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 61.77. This is the 52nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q2 2019. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The T2000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The T2000 Mobile includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,575 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,785 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 60 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The T2000 Mobile has the 152nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 12.91% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Turing
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ3 2017Q2 2019
Launch Price (MSRP)$499--
Production StatusActiveActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021
Display FPS for Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin
Monster Hunter Stories 2
Display FPS for Resident Evil Village
Resident Evil Village
Display FPS for Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Display FPS for Outriders
Outriders
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Crysis Remastered
Crysis Remastered
Radeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
Low - 720p
229 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
121 FPS
--
High - 1080p
66 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
53 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
39 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
23 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 64 orQuadro T2000 Mobile

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 64 orQuadro T2000 Mobile

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 64128% better
30,823.529% of 104,737
Quadro T2000 Mobile
13,523.513% of 104,737

The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 128% better performance than the Quadro T2000 Mobile for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is ranked 72nd with a score of 30,823.5, and the Quadro T2000 Mobile is ranked 152nd with a score of 13,523.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 64
61.7738% of 161.45
Quadro T2000 Mobile
No data available

The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 94% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon RX Vega 64's 61.77 performance per dollar ranks it 52nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 64 or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 64 orQuadro T2000 Mobile

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
7,109
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
7,334
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
127,374
--
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
22,501
--
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
88,567
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
22,898
(+72.54%)
13,271
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
135.3
203
(+50.04%)
PassMark G3D Mark
14,334
(+100.39%)
7,153
PassMark G2D Mark
789
(+71.52%)
460
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
CodenameVega 10TU117
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Turing
Process Size14 nm12 nm
Transistors12,500 million4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
Memory Size8 GB4 GB
Memory TypeHBM2GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth483.8 Gb/s128.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock945 MHz2,001 MHz
Memory Interface2,048 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
Slots2 slots--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)295 W60 W
Suggested PSU600 W--
Power Connectors2x 8-pin--
OutputsHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
Stream Processors (SP)4,096--
CUDA Cores--1,024
Compute Units (CU)64--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--16
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25664
Render Output Units (ROP)6432
Core Clock Speed1,247 MHz1,575 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,546 MHz1,785 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
Pixel Fill Rate98.94 GPixel/s57.12 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate395.8 GTexel/s114.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance12.66 TFLOPS3.66 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance791.6 GFLOPS114.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 64Quadro T2000 Mobile
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.