AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 vs NVIDIA NVS 5200M

VS
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 562,786% better
29,08628% of 104,598
NVS 5200M
1,0081% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 2,786% better performance than the NVS 5200M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 56
72.945% of 161.45
NVS 5200M
No data available

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 45% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Radeon RX Vega 56
Shop NVS 5200M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2017 with a MSRP of $399. It is built on the GCN 5.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Vega 10) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX Vega 56 has 8 GB of HBM2 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 2,048 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 409.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega 56 includes 3,584 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,156 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,471 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 224 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The RX Vega 56 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 550 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 210 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The RX Vega 56 has the 81st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.81% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 29,086 score and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 72.9. This is the 42nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA NVS 5200M GPU

The NVIDIA NVS 5200M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2012. It is built on the Fermi 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GF117) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The NVS 5200M has 1,024 MB of DDR3 memory, with a 900 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 14.4 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The NVS 5200M includes 96 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 625 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 16 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 4 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The NVS 5200M has the 456th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Fermi 2.0
Market SegmentDesktopMobile
Release DateQ3 2017Q2 2012
Launch Price (MSRP)$399--
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Tom Clancy's The Division 2
The Division 2
Display FPS for Dirt Rally 2.0
Dirt Rally 2.0
Display FPS for Anthem
Anthem
Display FPS for Far Cry New Dawn
Far Cry New Dawn
Display FPS for Metro Exodus
Metro Exodus
Display FPS for Apex Legends
Apex Legends
Display FPS for Just Cause 4
Just Cause 4

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Tom Clancy's The Division 2
The Division 2
Radeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
Low - 720p
163 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
123 FPS
--
High - 1080p
95 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
75 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
58 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
30 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 56 orNVS 5200M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 56 orNVS 5200M

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 562,786% better
29,08628% of 104,598
NVS 5200M
1,0081% of 104,598

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 2,786% better performance than the NVS 5200M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is ranked 81st with a score of 29,086, and the NVS 5200M is ranked 456th with a score of 1,008.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 56
72.945% of 161.45
NVS 5200M
No data available

The Radeon RX Vega 56 has 111% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon RX Vega 56's 72.9 performance per dollar ranks it 42nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 56 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER29,668+2%
GeForce GTX 108029,263+1%
Radeon RX Vega 5629,086
GeForce RTX 306028,375-2%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti27,503-5%
Radeon HD 6650M1,037-96%
GeForce GT 630M1,035-96%
NVS 5200M1,008-97%
Radeon HD 6550M993-97%
GeForce GT 550M973.5-97%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 56 orNVS 5200M

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6,482
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
6,746
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
125,359
(+2,433.02%)
4,949
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
20,759
(+2,848.72%)
704
3DMark 11 Performance Score
22,937
(+1,919.1%)
1,136
PassMark G3D Mark
13,228
(+2,478.56%)
513
PassMark G2D Mark
761
(+298.43%)
191
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
9.8
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
9.8
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
CodenameVega 10GF117
ArchitectureGCN 5.0Fermi 2.0
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors12,500 million585 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
Memory Size8 GB1,024 MB
Memory TypeHBM2DDR3
Memory Bandwidth409.6 Gb/s14.4 Gb/s
Memory Clock800 MHz900 MHz
Memory Interface2,048 bit64 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache4 MB128 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
Slots2 slots--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM
Thermal Design Power (TDP)210 W25 W
Suggested PSU550 W--
Power Connectors2x 8-pin--
OutputsHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4aDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
Stream Processors (SP)3,584--
CUDA Cores--96
Compute Units (CU)56--
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--2
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)22416
Render Output Units (ROP)644
Core Clock Speed1,156 MHz625 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,471 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
Pixel Fill Rate94.14 GPixel/s2.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate329.5 GTexel/s10 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance10.54 TFLOPS240 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance659 GFLOPS20 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 56NVS 5200M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.11.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.75.1

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.