PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD
VS
NVIDIA
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 5
3,5353% of 129,772
GeForce GTX 1650289% better
13,75911% of 129,772

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 289% better performance than the Radeon RX Vega 5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 5
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650
92.3456% of 165.13

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 56% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.

Shop Radeon RX Vega 5
Shop GeForce GTX 1650
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX Vega 5 GPU

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is an graphics card by AMD. It is built on the Vega GPU microarchitecture and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX Vega 5 includes 320 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 15 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX Vega 5 has the 306th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 2.72% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2019 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 1650 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 2,001 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 128.1 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 1650 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,485 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,665 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 1650 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 1650 has the 169th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.60% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 13,759 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 92.34. This is the 34th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureVegaTuring
Market SegmentIntegratedDesktop
Release Date--Q2 2019
Launch Price (MSRP)--$149
Production Status--Active
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for God of War Ragnarök
God of War Ragnarök
Display FPS for Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2
Display FPS for Once Human
Once Human
Display FPS for The First Descendant
The First Descendant
Display FPS for Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for God of War Ragnarök
God of War Ragnarök
Radeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Low - 1080p
--
6 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 5 orGeForce GTX 1650
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER55.5+874%
GeForce GTX 16505.7

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 5 orGeForce GTX 1650
GPUCost Per Frame
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER2.86-89%
GeForce GTX 165026.14

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX Vega 5
3,5353% of 129,772
GeForce GTX 1650289% better
13,75911% of 129,772

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 289% better performance than the Radeon RX Vega 5 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX Vega 5 is ranked 306th with a score of 3,535, and the GeForce GTX 1650 is ranked 169th with a score of 13,759.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX Vega 5
No data available
GeForce GTX 1650
92.3456% of 165.13

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 142% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

GeForce GTX 1650's 92.34 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 5 or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti15,619+342%
Arc A38013,892+293%
GeForce GTX 165013,759+289%
Radeon R9 38012,191+245%
Radeon R9 280X10,792+205%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake, 64EU)4,187+18%
Radeon R8 M445DX3,775+7%
Radeon RX Vega 53,535
UHD Graphics 7703,428-3%
Radeon RX Vega 103,389-4%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX Vega 5 orGeForce GTX 1650
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER114.62+24%
Radeon RX 570112.23+22%
Radeon RX 47098.46+7%
GeForce GTX 166096.18+4%
Arc A38093.23+1%
GeForce GTX 165092.34
Radeon RX 59083.74-9%
GeForce GTX 105078.63-15%
Radeon RX 48078.25-15%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti68.01-26%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
733
3,525
(+380.9%)
3DMark Time Spy Score
825
3,903
(+373.09%)
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18,282
54,198
(+196.46%)
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2,438
9,460.5
(+288.04%)
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
10,222
44,728
(+337.57%)
3DMark 11 Performance Score
3,763
14,069
(+273.88%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
62.3
174.5
(+180.1%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
7,886
PassMark G2D Mark
--
565
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
26.2
--
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
24.6
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Codename--TU117
ArchitectureVegaTuring
Process Size7 nm12 nm
Transistors--4,700 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Memory Size--4 GB
Memory Type--GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth--128.1 Gb/s
Memory Clock--2,001 MHz
Memory Interface--128 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache--1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Slots--2 slots
Bus Interface--PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)15 W75 W
Suggested PSU--250 W
Outputs--DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Stream Processors (SP)320--
CUDA Cores--896
Stream Multiprocessors (SM)--14
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)--56
Render Output Units (ROP)--32
Core Clock Speed--1,485 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,400 MHz1,665 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
Pixel Fill Rate--53.28 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate--93.24 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance--2.98 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance--93.24 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX Vega 5GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX--12 (12_1)
OpenCL--3.0
OpenGL--4.6
Shader Model--6.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.