AMD Radeon RX 8060S vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon RX 8060S has 132% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 Nano has 16% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon RX 8060S GPU
The Radeon RX 8060S is a graphics card by AMD. It is built on the RDNA 3.5 GPU microarchitecture.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 8060S includes 40 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 40 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Benchmark Performance
The RX 8060S has the 52nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 30.95% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 Nano has the 149th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 93rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release Date | -- | Q3 2015 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $649 |
| Production Status | -- | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
God of War Ragnarök | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 112 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 96 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | 83 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | 76 FPS | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 58 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 33 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | 78 | +135% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | 56.2 | +69% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 42 | +27% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 35.6 | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 33.9 | +2% |
| Radeon RX 8060S | 33.2 | |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 31 | -7% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX 8060S has 132% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 8060S is ranked 52nd with a score of 40,164, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 149th with a score of 17,282.
The Radeon R9 Nano has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
Radeon R9 Nano's 26.63 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 41,302 | +3% |
| Radeon RX 6800M | 40,390.5 | +1% |
| Radeon RX 8060S | 40,164 | |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 38,690.5 | -4% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 37,933 | -6% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | -56% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | -57% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | -57% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | -60% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -60% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | +33% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +6% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -16% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -23% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -51% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 10,285 (+128%) | 4,511 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10,336.5 (+126.88%) | 4,556 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 148,182 (+82.1%) | 81,374 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 26,825.5 (+86.78%) | 14,362 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 32,451.5 (+119.37%) | 14,793 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 392.5 | -- |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | -- | Fiji |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Size | -- | 28 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 8,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | -- | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | -- | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | -- | 512 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | -- | 500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | -- | 4,096 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | -- | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 175 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | -- | 1x 8-pin |
| Outputs | -- | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 40 | 4,096 |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 64 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | -- | 256 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | -- | 64 |
| Ray Accelerators | 40 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | -- | 1,000 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,900 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | -- | 64 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | -- | 256 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | -- | 8.19 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 512 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8060S | Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | -- | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | -- | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | -- | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | -- | 6.5 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.