AMD Radeon RX 8050S vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon RX 8050S has 737% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 13% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon RX 8050S GPU
The Radeon RX 8050S is a graphics card by AMD.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 8050S includes 32 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. Additionally, the GPU features 32 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Benchmark Performance
The RX 8050S has the 67th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 27.99% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
About the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 GPU
The AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation graphics card that launched in Q3 2019 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Polaris 23) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.
Memory
The Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The Pro WX 3200 includes 640 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,295 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 32 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The Pro WX 3200 is a compact, low-profile graphics card that fits into 1 PCIe expansion slot. It supports mini-DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 65 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Pro WX 3200 has the 291st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 3.34% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 4,337.5 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 21.8. This is the 95th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | -- | GCN 4.0 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Workstation |
| Release Date | -- | Q3 2019 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | -- | $199 |
| Production Status | -- | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | 179 FPS | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | 169 FPS | -- |
| High - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile | 225 | +33% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 209 | +23% |
| Arc A770M | 196.4 | +16% |
| Radeon RX 8060S | 185.6 | +10% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 182 | +7% |
| Radeon RX 8050S | 169.4 | |
| Arc A730M | 140.3 | -17% |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | 106.2 | -37% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX 8050S has 737% better performance than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 8050S is ranked 67th with a score of 36,323, and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is ranked 291st with a score of 4,337.5.
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 34% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.
Radeon Pro WX 3200's 21.8 performance per dollar ranks it 0th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Arc A770M | 37,375 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | 36,969.5 | +2% |
| Radeon RX 8050S | 36,323 | |
| RTX A5000 Mobile | 36,163.5 | -0% |
| Radeon RX 6800S | 36,101 | -1% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 19,978 | -45% |
| Quadro P4000 | 15,433 | -58% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 4,337.5 | -88% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 3,690.5 | -90% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| RTX A2000 | 44.49 | +104% |
| RTX A2000 (12 GB) | 44.49 | +104% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 21.8 | |
| Radeon PRO W6800 | 19.74 | -9% |
| Quadro P4000 | 18.94 | -13% |
| Radeon Pro WX 3100 | 18.55 | -15% |
| RTX A6000 | 10.96 | -50% |
| RTX 6000 Ada Generation | 10.42 | -52% |
| Quadro P5000 | 8.04 | -63% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,502 (+894.45%) | 955.5 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,007 (+750.52%) | 1,059 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 130,145 (+589.84%) | 18,866 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 23,521 (+645.28%) | 3,156 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 29,391 (+531.11%) | 4,657 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 309 (+303.92%) | 76.5 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 2,289 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 395 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | -- | Polaris 23 |
| Architecture | -- | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Size | -- | 14 nm |
| Transistors | -- | 2,200 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | -- | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | -- | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | -- | 96 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | -- | 1,500 MHz |
| Memory Interface | -- | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | -- | 16 KB |
| L2 Cache | -- | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | -- | 1 slot |
| Bus Interface | -- | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | -- | 65 W |
| Suggested PSU | -- | 250 W |
| Outputs | -- | mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 32 | 640 |
| Compute Units (CU) | -- | 10 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | -- | 32 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | -- | 16 |
| Ray Accelerators | 32 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | -- | 1,295 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,800 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | -- | 20.72 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | -- | 41.44 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | -- | 1.66 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | -- | 103.6 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon RX 8050S | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | -- | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | -- | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | -- | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | -- | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.