AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs AMD FirePro M2000
The Radeon RX 7600M has 4,074% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 7600M and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon RX 7600M GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2023. It is built on the RDNA 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 33) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.
Memory
The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 256 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 7600M includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,500 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,410 MHz. It usually operates at 2,070 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 28 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 90 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RX 7600M has the 58th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 33.51% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
About the AMD FirePro M2000 GPU
The AMD FirePro M2000 is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q3 2012. It is built on the TeraScale 2 GPU microarchitecture (codename Turks) and is manufactured on a 40 nm process.
Memory
The FirePro M2000 has 1,024 MB of GDDR5 memory, with a 800 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 25.6 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The FirePro M2000 includes 480 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 500 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 24 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 8 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 33 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The FirePro M2000 has the 478th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 0.80% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q1 2023 | Q3 2012 |
| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Dragon's Dogma 2 | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | -- |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | -- |
| High - 1080p | 50 FPS | -- |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | -- |
| QHD - 1440p | 35 FPS | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | 20 FPS | -- |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | 31 | +58% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 31 | +58% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | 27.6 | +41% |
| Radeon RX 7600M XT | 26.8 | +37% |
| Radeon RX 7600S | 24.2 | +23% |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 19.6 | |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 18.4 | -6% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
The Radeon RX 7600M has 4,074% better performance than the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 7600M is ranked 58th with a score of 35,101, and the FirePro M2000 is ranked 478th with a score of 841.
We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 7600M and the FirePro M2000 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6800S | 36,101 | +3% |
| RTX A5500 Mobile | 35,376 | +1% |
| Radeon RX 7600M | 35,101 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | 34,897 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | 34,875.5 | -1% |
| Radeon HD 6630M | 877 | -98% |
| Mobility Radeon HD 5650 | 855.5 | -98% |
| FirePro M2000 | 841 | -98% |
| Radeon HD 7570M | 829 | -98% |
| GeForce GT 435M | 799 | -98% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs. | |||
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 9,097 | -- |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9,172 | -- |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 126,084 | -- |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 25,679 | -- |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 28,427 (+2,879.77%) | 954 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | 173 | -- |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 3,940 (+827.06%) | 425 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 480 (+134.15%) | 205 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Navi 33 | Turks |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Size | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 13,300 million | 716 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 1,024 MB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 Gb/s | 25.6 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | -- |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | -- |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 W | 33 W |
| Outputs | Device Dependent | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 1,792 | 480 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 28 | 6 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 112 | 24 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 8 |
| Ray Accelerators | 28 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,500 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,410 MHz | -- |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | 2,070 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 154.2 GPixel/s | 4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 269.9 GTexel/s | 12 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 17.27 TFLOPS | 480 GFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 539.8 GFLOPS | -- |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon RX 7600M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.0 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.