AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

VS
Performance
Radeon RX 6950 XT318% better
72,227.569% of 104,598
Radeon R9 Nano
17,28217% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 318% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6950 XT147% better
65.7241% of 161.45
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45

The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 147% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon RX 6950 XT
Shop Radeon R9 Nano
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $1,099. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Memory

The RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,250 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 576 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 6950 XT includes 5,120 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,860 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,310 MHz. It usually operates at 2,100 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 320 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 128 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The RX 6950 XT is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 335 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 700 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The RX 6950 XT has the 8th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 69.05% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 72,227.5 score and $1,099 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 65.72. This is the 48th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0GCN 3.0
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ2 2022Q3 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$1,099$649
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
Low - 1080p
534 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
517 FPS
--
High - 1080p
407 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
96 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
62 FPS
--
4K UHD - 2160p
30 FPS
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6950 XT orRadeon R9 Nano

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6950 XT orRadeon R9 Nano
GPUCost Per Frame
Radeon RX 7900 XTX21.44-41%
GeForce RTX 408021.8-40%
Radeon RX 7900 XT24.3-33%
Radeon RX 680028.11-23%
Radeon RX 6950 XT36.39
GeForce RTX 309037.01+2%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX 6950 XT318% better
72,227.569% of 104,598
Radeon R9 Nano
17,28217% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 318% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is ranked 8th with a score of 72,227.5, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6950 XT147% better
65.7241% of 161.45
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45

The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 147% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is ranked 48th with a performance per dollar of 65.72, and the Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 82nd with a performance per dollar of 26.63.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6950 XT or

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6950 XT or

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
22,004
(+387.79%)
4,511
3DMark Time Spy Score
20,574
(+351.58%)
4,556
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
229,172
(+181.63%)
81,374
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
59,882
(+316.95%)
14,362
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
186,146
--
3DMark 11 Performance Score
48,816.5
(+230%)
14,793
PassMark G3D Mark
28,182
--
PassMark G2D Mark
1,035
--
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
CodenameNavi 21Fiji
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0GCN 3.0
Process Size7 nm28 nm
Transistors26,800 million8,900 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
Memory Size16 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6HBM
Memory Bandwidth576 Gb/s512 Gb/s
Memory Clock2,250 MHz500 MHz
Memory Interface256 bit4,096 bit
L1 Cache128 KB16 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
Slots3 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)335 W175 W
Suggested PSU700 W450 W
Power Connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin
OutputsHDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4aHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
Stream Processors (SP)5,1204,096
Compute Units (CU)8064
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)320256
Render Output Units (ROP)12864
Ray Accelerators80--
Core Clock Speed1,860 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,310 MHz--
Core Clock Speed (Game)2,100 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
Pixel Fill Rate295.7 GPixel/s64 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate739.2 GTexel/s256 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance23.65 TFLOPS8.19 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance1,478 GFLOPS512 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX 6950 XTRadeon R9 Nano
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.