Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon RX 6900 XT617% better
59,11957% of 104,598
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6900 XT has 617% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6900 XT
59.1837% of 161.45
GeForce MX450
No data available
The Radeon RX 6900 XT has 37% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon RX 6900 XT
Shop GeForce MX450
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT GPU
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q4 2020 with a MSRP of $999. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 21) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.
Memory
The RX 6900 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 2,000 MHz memory clock and a 256 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RX 6900 XT includes 5,120 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,825 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,250 MHz. It usually operates at 2,015 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 320 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 128 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The RX 6900 XT is a large graphics card, occupying 3 PCIe 4.0 x16 expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C display connections. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 300 W and a large, 3-slot size, it is recommended to use a power supply of 700 W and a case with sufficient space to accommodate the card. Compare your card's model and your case's dimensions to verify compatibility.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The RX 6900 XT has the 18th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 56.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 59,119 score and $999 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 59.18. This is the 55th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce MX450 GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce MX450 is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2020. It is built on the Turing GPU microarchitecture (codename TU117S) and is manufactured on a 12 nm process.
Memory
The MX450 has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,250 MHz memory clock and a 64 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The MX450 includes 896 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,395 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,575 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 31 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The MX450 has the 202nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.89% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q4 2020 | Q3 2020 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $999 | -- |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
F1 24
Horizon Forbidden West
Skull & Bones
Assassin's Creed Mirage
EA Sports FC 24
Counter-Strike 2
Baldur's Gate 3
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
F1 24 | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 26 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 20 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 13 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | -- |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6900 XT orGeForce MX450
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce MX450 | 13.4 | |
| RTX A500 Mobile | 11.7 | -13% |
| Radeon 680M | 7.41 | -45% |
| Radeon 660M | 5.6 | -58% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6900 XT orGeForce MX450
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon RX 6900 XT617% better
59,11957% of 104,598
GeForce MX450
8,2508% of 104,598
The Radeon RX 6900 XT has 617% better performance than the GeForce MX450 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon RX 6900 XT is ranked 18th with a score of 59,119, and the GeForce MX450 is ranked 202nd with a score of 8,250.
Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6900 XT
59.1837% of 161.45
GeForce MX450
No data available
The Radeon RX 6900 XT has 90% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon RX 6900 XT's 59.18 performance per dollar ranks it 55th among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6900 XT or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 60,980 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 59,969 | +1% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59,119 | |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 57,340 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 56,634 | -4% |
| Radeon RX 560 Mobile | 8,329 | -86% |
| Quadro M3000M | 8,288.5 | -86% |
| GeForce MX450 | 8,250 | -86% |
| Iris Xe MAX | 8,214 | -86% |
| Radeon RX 560X Mobile | 8,211.5 | -86% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6900 XT orGeForce MX450
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 76.84 | +30% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | 71.95 | +22% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 (12 GB) | 70.88 | +20% |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | 65.72 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | 65.41 | +11% |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 59.18 | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER | 58.6 | -1% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 57.62 | -3% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 50.86 | -14% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47.21 | -20% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 18,210 (+858.42%) | 1,900 |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 17,549 (+736.06%) | 2,099 |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | -- | 27,570 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 50,587 (+970.62%) | 4,725 |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | 160,895 (+675.64%) | 20,743.5 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 42,418 (+425.76%) | 8,068 |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 130 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | 26,809 (+618.16%) | 3,733 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | 1,058 (+248.03%) | 304 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11 | -- | 57.2 |
| Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL | -- | 53.9 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Navi 21 | TU117S |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Size | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistors | 26,800 million | 4,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 Gb/s | 80 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 2,000 MHz | 1,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 256 bit | 64 bit |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 3 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 W | 31 W |
| Suggested PSU | 700 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a, USB Type-C | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 5,120 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 896 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 80 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 14 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 320 | 56 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 128 | 32 |
| Ray Accelerators | 80 | -- |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,825 MHz | 1,395 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | 2,250 MHz | 1,575 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Game) | 2,015 MHz | -- |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 288 GPixel/s | 50.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 720 GTexel/s | 88.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS | 2.82 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 1,440 GFLOPS | 88.2 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon RX 6900 XT | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.