AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

VS
Performance
Radeon RX 6650M496% better
32,84631% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 6650M has 496% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6650M
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 6650M and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon RX 6650M
Shop Radeon R9 M385X
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX 6650M GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2022. It is built on the RDNA 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 23) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Memory

The RX 6650M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 224 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 6650M includes 1,792 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,068 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,416 MHz. It usually operates at 2,222 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 112 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 28 ray accelerators dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 6650M has the 65th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 31.40% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the AMD Radeon R9 M385X GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 M385X is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q2 2015. It is built on the GCN 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Strato) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 M385X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,200 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 76.8 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 M385X includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,100 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The R9 M385X has the 234th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 5.27% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0GCN 2.0
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2022Q2 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6
Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
Display FPS for EA Sports F1 22
EA Sports F1 22
Display FPS for God of War
God of War
Display FPS for Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy
Guardians of the Galaxy
Display FPS for F1 2021
F1 2021
Display FPS for Hitman 3
Hitman 3

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Far Cry 6
Far Cry 6
Radeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
Low - 720p
111 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
105 FPS
--
High - 1080p
96 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
88 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6650M orRadeon R9 M385X

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6650M orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX 6650M496% better
32,84631% of 104,598
Radeon R9 M385X
5,514.55% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 6650M has 496% better performance than the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX 6650M is ranked 65th with a score of 32,846, and the Radeon R9 M385X is ranked 234th with a score of 5,514.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 6650M
No data available
Radeon R9 M385X
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 6650M and the Radeon R9 M385X for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6650M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile33,996+4%
Radeon RX 6700M33,497+2%
Radeon RX 6650M32,846
Radeon RX 6700S32,662-1%
Radeon RX 6600M31,868-3%
Radeon HD 7970M5,645-83%
Radeon HD 6970M X25,541.5-83%
Radeon R9 M385X5,514.5-83%
Radeon Pro 4555,388-84%
FirePro M61005,369-84%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 6650M orRadeon R9 M385X
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
8,700
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
8,869
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
--
22,544
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
25,739
(+656.03%)
3,404.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
26,153
(+486.85%)
4,456.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
175.8
(+292.41%)
44.8
PassMark G3D Mark
15,084
(+656.47%)
1,994
PassMark G2D Mark
778
(+191.39%)
267
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
CodenameNavi 23Strato
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0GCN 2.0
Process Size7 nm28 nm
Transistors11,060 million2,080 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
Memory Size8 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth224 Gb/s76.8 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,200 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache128 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)120 W75 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
Stream Processors (SP)1,792896
Compute Units (CU)2814
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)11256
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Ray Accelerators28--
Core Clock Speed2,068 MHz1,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)2,416 MHz1,100 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Game)2,222 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
Pixel Fill Rate154.6 GPixel/s17.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate270.6 GTexel/s61.6 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.66 TFLOPS1.97 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance541.2 GFLOPS123.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX 6650MRadeon R9 M385X
DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.5

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.