AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

VS
Performance
Radeon RX 560 Mobile62% better
8,3298% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile has 62% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 560 Mobile
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 560 Mobile and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon RX 560 Mobile
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 560 Mobile is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q1 2017. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX 560 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,500 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 96 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 560 Mobile includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,053 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 560 Mobile has the 200th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 7.96% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Maxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ1 2017Q4 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Display FPS for Assassin´s Creed Origins
Assassin´s Creed Origins
Display FPS for Destiny 2
Destiny 2
Display FPS for Fortnite
Fortnite
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for Rocket League
Rocket League

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Kingdom Come: Deliverance
Radeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
Low - 720p
53 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
33 FPS
--
High - 1080p
28 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
21 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 560 Mobile orQuadro M2000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 560 Mobile orQuadro M2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX 560 Mobile62% better
8,3298% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile has 62% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX 560 Mobile is ranked 200th with a score of 8,329, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 560 Mobile
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 560 Mobile and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 560 Mobile or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 M395 (Mac Edition)8,656+4%
GeForce GTX 880M8,578+3%
Radeon RX 560 Mobile8,329
Quadro M3000M8,288.5-0%
GeForce MX4508,250-1%
GeForce GTX 960M5,278-37%
Radeon Pro 5555,185-38%
Quadro M2000M5,143-38%
Quadro K4100M4,957-40%
GeForce GTX 860M4,902-41%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 560 Mobile orQuadro M2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
36,528
(+22.6%)
29,795
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
5,738
(+38.03%)
4,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
6,955
(+27.47%)
5,456
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
98.6
(+6.36%)
92.7
PassMark G3D Mark
--
3,458
PassMark G2D Mark
--
342
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
52.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
42.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
CodenameBaffinGM107
ArchitectureGCN 4.0Maxwell
Process Size14 nm28 nm
Transistors3,000 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth96 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,500 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1,024 KB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
Bus InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)55 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
Stream Processors (SP)896--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)14--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)5640
Render Output Units (ROP)1616
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,098 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,053 MHz1,137 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
Pixel Fill Rate16.85 GPixel/s18.19 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate58.97 GTexel/s45.48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance1.89 TFLOPS1,455 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance117.9 GFLOPS45.48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX 560 MobileQuadro M2000M
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.76.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.