AMD Radeon RX 5500M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

VS
Performance
Radeon RX 5500M220% better
16,47616% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 5500M has 220% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 5500M
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 5500M and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon RX 5500M
Shop Quadro M2000M
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon RX 5500M GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 5500M is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q4 2019. It is built on the RDNA 1.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Navi 14) and is manufactured on a 7 nm process.

Memory

The RX 5500M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 224 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 5500M includes 1,408 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,375 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,645 MHz. It usually operates at 1,448 MHz during typical gaming workloads. Complementing the processing units are 88 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 85 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 5500M has the 136th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 15.75% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

About the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M GPU

The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is an end-of-life mobile graphics card that released in Q4 2015. It is built on the Maxwell GPU microarchitecture (codename GM107) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The M2000M has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,253 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 80.19 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The M2000M includes 640 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,098 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,137 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 40 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 55 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The M2000M has the 247th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 4.92% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Maxwell
Market SegmentMobileMobile
Release DateQ4 2019Q4 2015
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Display FPS for Alan Wake 2
Alan Wake 2
Display FPS for Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Lords of the Fallen (2023)
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Display FPS for EA Sports FC 24
EA Sports FC 24
Display FPS for Counter-Strike 2
Counter-Strike 2

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest
Radeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
Low - 1080p
44 FPS
--
Medium - 1080p
36 FPS
--
High - 1080p
35 FPS
--
Ultra - 1080p
35 FPS
--
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 5500M orQuadro M2000M

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 5500M orQuadro M2000M
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon RX 5500M220% better
16,47616% of 104,598
Quadro M2000M
5,1435% of 104,598

The Radeon RX 5500M has 220% better performance than the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon RX 5500M is ranked 136th with a score of 16,476, and the Quadro M2000M is ranked 247th with a score of 5,143.

Performance per dollar
Radeon RX 5500M
No data available
Quadro M2000M
No data available

We do not have any performance per dollar data for the Radeon RX 5500M and the Quadro M2000M for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 5500M or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 980 Mobile17,200.5+4%
Quadro P3200 Mobile16,619+1%
Radeon RX 5500M16,476
Quadro P4000 Max-Q15,837-4%
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile15,712-5%
GeForce GTX 960M5,278-68%
Radeon Pro 5555,185-69%
Quadro M2000M5,143-69%
Quadro K4100M4,957-70%
GeForce GTX 860M4,902-70%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon RX 5500M orQuadro M2000M
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
Our database does not have enough data to compare the benchmark performance per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,298
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,174
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
50,946
(+70.99%)
29,795
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
12,276
(+195.31%)
4,157
3DMark 11 Performance Score
13,344
(+144.57%)
5,456
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
103
(+11.11%)
92.7
PassMark G3D Mark
5,549
(+60.47%)
3,458
PassMark G2D Mark
408
(+19.3%)
342
Unigine Heaven 3.0 DirectX 11
--
52.7
Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
--
42.1
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
CodenameNavi 14GM107
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0Maxwell
Process Size7 nm28 nm
Transistors6,400 million1,870 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
Memory Size4 GB4 GB
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth224 Gb/s80.19 Gb/s
Memory Clock1,750 MHz1,253 MHz
Memory Interface128 bit128 bit
L1 Cache--64 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
Bus InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8MXM-A (3.0)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)85 W55 W
OutputsDevice DependentDevice Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
Stream Processors (SP)1,408--
CUDA Cores--640
Compute Units (CU)22--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)8840
Render Output Units (ROP)3216
Core Clock Speed1,375 MHz1,098 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)1,645 MHz1,137 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Game)1,448 MHz--

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
Pixel Fill Rate52.64 GPixel/s18.19 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate144.8 GTexel/s45.48 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance4.63 TFLOPS1,455 GFLOPS
FP64 Performance289.5 GFLOPS45.48 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon RX 5500MQuadro M2000M
DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.86.7 (5.1)

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.