AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) has 177% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) has 350% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Summary
About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU
The Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card by AMD. It launched in Q3 2015 with a suggested retail price of $649. Its Fiji chip that powers the GPU uses the GCN 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on the 28 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 4 GB of HBM VRAM. Its 500 MHz memory clock and 4,096 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 512 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
The R9 Nano is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 175 W. AMD recommends using a power supply of at least 450 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The Radeon R9 Nano has the 131st highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.47% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 80th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is a desktop graphics card by NVIDIA. It launched in Q2 2023 with a suggested retail price of $399. Its AD106 chip that powers the GPU uses the Ada Lovelace architecture and is fabricated on the 5 nm process.
Memory
This GPU is paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 VRAM. Its 2,250 MHz memory clock and 128 bit interface gives it a bandwidth of 288 Gb/s. This impacts how much data it can store, and how fast it transfers the data to and from memory.
Compatibility
The RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is a dual slot graphics card, taking up 2 PCIe slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a display ports. This desktop card has a TDP of 160 W. NVIDIA recommends using a power supply of at least 450 W with this card. A power supply lower than this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) has the 28th highest 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 540 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 45.55% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 47,803 score and $399 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 119.81. This is the 7th best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2023 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $649 | $399 |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Sons of the Forest | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 126 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 112 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 108 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 107 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 82 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | 50 FPS |
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 4070 | 59.7 | +19% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 59 | +18% |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 54.6 | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 51.7 | +3% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 50.5 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 50 | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 45.1 | -10% |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | 38.4 | -23% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 38.2 | -24% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | 7.13 | -11% |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 7.61 | -5% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | 7.83 | -2% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 7.98 | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 8.85 | +11% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (16 GB) | 9.65 | +21% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | 9.66 | +21% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 9.7 | +22% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | 9.7 | +22% |
Benchmark Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) has 177% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 131st with a score of 17,282, and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is ranked 28th with a score of 47,803.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) has 350% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 80th with a performance per dollar of 26.63, and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) is ranked 7th with a performance per dollar of 119.81.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 52,046 | +201% |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 49,760 | +188% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 47,803 | +177% |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 47,166 | +173% |
| Radeon RX 7600 | 43,430 | +151% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | +2% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +1% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | 127.71 | +380% |
| Arc A770 | 125.54 | +371% |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) | 119.81 | +350% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | 114.15 | +329% |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 103.04 | +287% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +6% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -16% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -23% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 4,511 | 13,427 (+197.65%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4,556 | 13,872 (+204.48%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 81,374 | 176,605 (+117.03%) |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 14,362 | 34,245 (+138.44%) |
| 3DMark Night Raid Graphics | -- | 158,042 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 14,793 | 43,231 (+192.24%) |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 22,931 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 1,073 |
Technical Specs
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Fiji | AD106 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 8,900 million | 22,900 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 Gb/s | 288 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 500 MHz | 2,250 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 4,096 bit | 128 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | 2 slots |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 W | 160 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | 450 W |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |
| Outputs | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4a |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 4,096 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 4,352 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 64 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 34 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 256 | 136 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 136 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 34 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 2,310 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 2,535 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 64 GPixel/s | 121.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 256 GTexel/s | 344.8 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 8.19 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 512 GFLOPS | 344.8 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (8 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.