Contents:HighlightsSummaryGaming PerformanceBenchmark PerformanceTechnical SpecsRelated ComparisonsRelated GPUs
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano
17,28217% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)1% better
17,42117% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) has 1% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
No data available
The Radeon R9 Nano has 16% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.
Shop Radeon R9 Nano
Shop GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Summary
#
About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.
Memory
The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.
Benchmark Performance & Value
The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
About the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) GPU
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) is a mobile graphics card that launched in Q3 2022. It is built on the Ampere GPU microarchitecture (codename GA107) and is manufactured on a 8 nm process.
Memory
The RTX 3050 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 96 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 168 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.
Cores and Clock Speeds
The RTX 3050 Mobile includes 2,560 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,237 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,492 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 80 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 80 tensor cores optimized for AI-accelerated workloads and 20 RT cores dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.
Compatibility & Power Consumption
The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.
Benchmark Performance
The RTX 3050 Mobile has the 131st best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.66% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General Info
General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.
| Info | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Release Date | Q3 2015 | Q3 2022 |
| Launch Price (MSRP) | $649 | -- |
| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |
| Shop | Check Price | Check Price |
Gaming Performance
#
Select a game to compare FPS metrics
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
F1 23
Returnal
Cyberpunk 2077 (1.6)
EA Sports F1 22
FPS Benchmarks
This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.
- Frames Per Second
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Low - 1080p | -- | 40 FPS |
| Medium - 1080p | -- | 36 FPS |
| High - 1080p | -- | 32 FPS |
| Ultra - 1080p | -- | 23 FPS |
| QHD - 1440p | -- | 15 FPS |
| 4K UHD - 2160p | -- | -- |
FPS Source: Notebookcheck
Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)
The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
| GPU | Frames Per Second | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | 31 | +105% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | 30 | +99% |
| GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | 23 | +52% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) | 15.1 | |
| Arc A730M | 15 | -1% |
Compare Cost Per Frame
The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
| GPU | Cost Per Frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs. | ||
Benchmark Performance
#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano
17,28217% of 104,598
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)1% better
17,42117% of 104,598
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) has 1% better performance than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.
The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282, and the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) is ranked 131st with a score of 17,421.
Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
No data available
The Radeon R9 Nano has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
Radeon R9 Nano's 26.63 performance per dollar ranks it 82nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.
Relative Performance
The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
| GPU | Benchmark Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| Radeon R9 FURY | 17,543 | +2% |
| Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | 17,523 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | 17,439 | +1% |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) | 17,421 | +1% |
| GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB) | 17,401 | +1% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 17,282 | |
| GeForce GTX 980 Mobile | 17,200.5 | -0% |
| Quadro P3200 Mobile | 16,619 | -4% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 16,167.5 | -6% |
| GeForce GTX 970 | 16,033 | -7% |
Relative Value For Money
The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.
Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB)
| GPU | Performance Per Dollar | |
|---|---|---|
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | 35.53 | +33% |
| GeForce GTX 980 | 32.07 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 FURY | 31.95 | +20% |
| Radeon R9 290X | 29.45 | +11% |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | 28.14 | +6% |
| Radeon R9 Nano | 26.63 | |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | 22.34 | -16% |
| GeForce GTX 680 | 20.47 | -23% |
| GeForce GTX 590 | 13.11 | -51% |
Benchmark Scores
This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.
- Popular
| Benchmark | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy Graphics | 4,511 | 4,660.5 (+3.31%) |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4,556 | 5,057.5 (+11.01%) |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics | 81,374 (+12.26%) | 72,486 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics | 14,362 (+20.08%) | 11,960 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance Score | 14,793 | 17,223 (+16.43%) |
| Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit | -- | 221 |
| PassMark G3D Mark | -- | 10,316 |
| PassMark G2D Mark | -- | 607 |
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck
Technical Specs
#
Graphics Processor
General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Codename | Fiji | GA107 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Size | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistors | 8,900 million | 8,700 million |
Memory Details
Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Memory Size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 Gb/s | 168 Gb/s |
| Memory Clock | 500 MHz | 1,750 MHz |
| Memory Interface | 4,096 bit | 96 bit |
| L1 Cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Board Compatibility
Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Slots | 2 slots | -- |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 W | 75 W |
| Suggested PSU | 450 W | -- |
| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | -- |
| Outputs | HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 | Device Dependent |
Cores & Clock Speeds
Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Stream Processors (SP) | 4,096 | -- |
| CUDA Cores | -- | 2,560 |
| Compute Units (CU) | 64 | -- |
| Stream Multiprocessors (SM) | -- | 20 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMU) | 256 | 80 |
| Render Output Units (ROP) | 64 | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | -- | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | -- | 20 |
| Core Clock Speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,237 MHz |
| Core Clock Speed (Boost) | -- | 1,492 MHz |
Theoretical Performance
Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel Fill Rate | 64 GPixel/s | 47.74 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 256 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| FP32 Performance | 8.19 TFLOPS | 7.64 TFLOPS |
| FP64 Performance | 512 GFLOPS | 119.4 GFLOPS |
API Support
Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.
| Spec | Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (6 GB) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:
Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:
* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.