AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano61% better
17,28217% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 960
10,767.510% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 Nano has 61% better performance than the GeForce GTX 960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 960103% better
54.1134% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 960 has 103% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
Shop GeForce GTX 960
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.50% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 GPU

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q1 2015 with a MSRP of $199. It is built on the Maxwell 2.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename GM206) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The GTX 960 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,753 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112.2 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The GTX 960 includes 1,024 CUDA cores, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,127 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,178 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GTX 960 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. NVIDIA recommends a power supply of at least 300 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 120 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The GTX 960 has the 172nd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.28% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 10,767.5 score and $199 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 54.11. This is the 61st best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
ManufacturerAMDNVIDIA
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Maxwell 2.0
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ3 2015Q1 2015
Launch Price (MSRP)$649$199
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeEnd-of-life
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Display FPS for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
The Witcher 3
Display FPS for Grand Theft Auto V
GTA V
Display FPS for BioShock Infinite
BioShock Infinite

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Radeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
Low - 768p
--
113 FPS
Medium - 768p
--
71 FPS
High - 1080p
--
44 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
56 FPS(+55.68%)
36 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD
30 FPS(+75.29%)
17 FPS
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUCost Per Frame
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)10.68-51%
Radeon R7 37011.2-49%
GeForce GTX 96011.71-46%
GeForce GTX 95012.23-44%
GeForce GTX 97013-40%
GeForce GTX 98019.68-10%
Radeon R9 290X20.18-7%
Radeon R9 Nano21.78
GeForce GTX 68029.01+33%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano61% better
17,28217% of 104,737
GeForce GTX 960
10,767.510% of 104,737

The Radeon R9 Nano has 61% better performance than the GeForce GTX 960 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282, and the GeForce GTX 960 is ranked 172nd with a score of 10,767.5.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
GeForce GTX 960103% better
54.1134% of 161.45

The GeForce GTX 960 has 103% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 82nd with a performance per dollar of 26.63, and the GeForce GTX 960 is ranked 61st with a performance per dollar of 54.11.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+1%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5-6%
GeForce GTX 97016,033-7%
Radeon R9 38012,191-29%
Radeon R9 280X10,792-38%
GeForce GTX 96010,767.5-38%
GeForce GTX 68010,216.5-41%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti9,453-45%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)58.2+119%
Radeon R7 37057.17+115%
GeForce GTX 96054.11+103%
GeForce GTX 95052.52+97%
GeForce GTX 97048.73+83%
Radeon R9 290X29.45+11%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14+6%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-16%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-23%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,511
--
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,556
--
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
81,374
(+63.02%)
49,917.5
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,362
(+81.44%)
7,915.5
3DMark 11 Performance Score
14,793
(+49.79%)
9,875.5
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
120
PassMark G3D Mark
--
6,078
PassMark G2D Mark
--
669
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
CodenameFijiGM206
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Maxwell 2.0
Process Size28 nm28 nm
Transistors8,900 million2,940 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeHBMGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/s112.2 Gb/s
Memory Clock500 MHz1,753 MHz
Memory Interface4,096 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB48 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
Slots2 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Thermal Design Power (TDP)175 W120 W
Suggested PSU450 W300 W
Power Connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin
OutputsHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2DVI, HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
Stream Processors (SP)4,096--
CUDA Cores--1,024
Compute Units (CU)64--
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25664
Render Output Units (ROP)6432
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,127 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,178 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s37.7 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate256 GTexel/s75.39 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.19 TFLOPS2.41 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance512 GFLOPS75.39 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 960
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.