PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc Graphics 140T

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano38% better
17,28213% of 129,772
Arc Graphics 140T
12,56610% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 38% better performance than the Arc Graphics 140T for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13
Arc Graphics 140T
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 16% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
Shop Arc Graphics 140T
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 149th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 93rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the Intel Arc Graphics 140T GPU

The Intel Arc Graphics 140T is an integrated graphics card that launched in Q1 2025. It is built on the Xe2-LPG GPU microarchitecture (codename Arrow Lake) and is manufactured on a 3 nm process.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc Graphics 140T includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 300 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,350 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The GPU has a thermal design power (TDP) of 35 W. A power supply not strong enough to handle this might result in system crashes and potentially damage your hardware.

Benchmark Performance

The Arc Graphics 140T has the 175th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 9.68% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Xe2-LPG
Market SegmentDesktopIntegrated
Release DateQ3 2015Q1 2025
Launch Price (MSRP)$649--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Total War: PHARAOH
Total War: PHARAOH
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for Strange Brigade
Strange Brigade
Display FPS for X-Plane 11
X-Plane 11
Display FPS for Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
Display FPS for Rise of the Tomb Raider
Rise of the Tomb Raider

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
Low - 1080p
--
80 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
72 FPS
High - 1080p
--
57 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
19 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orArc Graphics 140T
GPUFrames Per Second
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)20.4+7%
Arc Graphics 140T19
Radeon 780M12-37%
Radeon 860M11-42%
Radeon 740M2-89%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orArc Graphics 140T
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano38% better
17,28213% of 129,772
Arc Graphics 140T
12,56610% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 38% better performance than the Arc Graphics 140T for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 149th with a score of 17,282, and the Arc Graphics 140T is ranked 175th with a score of 12,566.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13
Arc Graphics 140T
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090.

Radeon R9 Nano's 26.63 performance per dollar ranks it 93rd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+1%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5-6%
GeForce GTX 97016,033-7%
Radeon RX Vega M GH14,302-17%
Radeon 780M12,818.5-26%
Arc Graphics 140T12,566-27%
Radeon 860M11,680-32%
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL10,020-42%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orArc Graphics 140T
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 980 Ti35.53+33%
GeForce GTX 98032.07+20%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95+20%
Radeon R9 290X29.45+11%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14+6%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-16%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-23%
GeForce GTX 59013.11-51%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,511
(+10.73%)
4,074
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,556
(+3.05%)
4,421
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
81,374
(+57.64%)
51,620
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,362
(+53.97%)
9,328
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
40,046
3DMark 11 Performance Score
14,793
(+10.17%)
13,428
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
--
205
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
CodenameFijiArrow Lake
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Xe2-LPG
Process Size28 nm3 nm
Transistors8,900 million17,800 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
Memory Size4 GBSystem Shared
Memory TypeHBMSystem Shared
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/sSystem Dependent
Memory Clock500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory Interface4,096 bitSystem Shared
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
Slots2 slots--
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)175 W35 W
Suggested PSU450 W--
Power Connectors1x 8-pin--
OutputsHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2Device Dependent

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
Stream Processors (SP)4,096--
Shading Units--1,024
Compute Units (CU)64--
Execution Units (EU)--8
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25664
Render Output Units (ROP)6432
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--128
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--8
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz300 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,350 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s75.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate256 GTexel/s150.4 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.19 TFLOPS4.81 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance512 GFLOPS1,203.2 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc Graphics 140T
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.8

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.