PC Part DB: Build Smarter: Compare PC part benchmarks & specsPC PART DB

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs Intel Arc A380

AMD
VS
Intel
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano24% better
17,28213% of 129,772
Arc A380
13,89211% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 24% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13
Arc A380250% better
93.2356% of 165.13

The Arc A380 has 250% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 149th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 13.32% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 93rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the Intel Arc A380 GPU

The Intel Arc A380 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q2 2022 with a MSRP of $149. It is built on the Generation 12.7 GPU microarchitecture (codename DG2-128) and is manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Memory

The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, with a 1,937 MHz memory clock and a 96 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 186 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The Arc A380 includes 1,024 shading units, the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 2,000 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 2,050 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 64 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 32 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing. Additionally, the GPU features 128 Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX) optimized for AI workloads and 8 ray tracing units dedicated to real-time ray tracing calculations.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The Arc A380 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.0 display connections. Intel recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The Arc A380 has the 168th best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 567 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 10.70% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. Its 13,892 score and $149 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 93.23. This is the 33rd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
ManufacturerAMDIntel
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Generation 12.7
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ3 2015Q2 2022
Launch Price (MSRP)$649$149
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for F1 24
F1 24
Display FPS for Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2
Display FPS for Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima
Display FPS for Dragon's Dogma 2
Dragon's Dogma 2
Display FPS for Horizon Forbidden West
Horizon Forbidden West
Display FPS for Alone in the Dark (2024)
Alone in the Dark (2024)
Display FPS for Sons of the Forest
Sons of the Forest

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for F1 24
F1 24
Radeon R9 NanoArc A380
Low - 1080p
--
109 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
91 FPS
High - 1080p
--
64 FPS
Ultra - 1080p
--
16 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orArc A380
GPUFrames Per Second
Arc A75056.5+247%
Arc A38016.3
Radeon RX 6500 XT10.4-36%

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orArc A380
GPUCost Per Frame
Arc A7505.12-44%
Arc A3809.14
Radeon RX 6500 XT19.13+109%

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano24% better
17,28213% of 129,772
Arc A380
13,89211% of 129,772

The Radeon R9 Nano has 24% better performance than the Arc A380 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 149th with a score of 17,282, and the Arc A380 is ranked 168th with a score of 13,892.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 165.13
Arc A380250% better
93.2356% of 165.13

The Arc A380 has 250% better value for the money than the Radeon R9 Nano for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 93rd with a performance per dollar of 26.63, and the Arc A380 is ranked 33rd with a performance per dollar of 93.23.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUBenchmark Performance
GeForce GTX 98017,604.5+2%
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+1%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5-6%
GeForce GTX 97016,033-7%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti15,619-10%
Arc A38013,892-20%
GeForce GTX 165013,759-20%
Radeon R9 38012,191-29%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 166096.18+261%
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER95.98+260%
Arc A38093.23+250%
GeForce GTX 165092.34+247%
Radeon RX 59083.74+214%
Radeon R9 290X29.45+11%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14+6%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-16%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-23%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,511
(+15.22%)
3,915
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,556
(+2.22%)
4,457
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
81,374
(+33.83%)
60,804
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,362
(+41.16%)
10,174
3DMark Night Raid Graphics
--
46,613
3DMark 11 Performance Score
14,793
15,095
(+2.04%)
PassMark G3D Mark
--
6,255
PassMark G2D Mark
--
601
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
CodenameFijiDG2-128
ArchitectureGCN 3.0Generation 12.7
Process Size28 nm6 nm
Transistors8,900 million7,200 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
Memory Size4 GB6 GB
Memory TypeHBMGDDR6
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/s186 Gb/s
Memory Clock500 MHz1,937 MHz
Memory Interface4,096 bit96 bit
L1 Cache16 KB--
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
Slots2 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)175 W75 W
Suggested PSU450 W250 W
Power Connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
OutputsHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.0

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
Stream Processors (SP)4,096--
Shading Units--1,024
Compute Units (CU)64--
Execution Units (EU)--1,024
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25664
Render Output Units (ROP)6432
Xe Matrix Extensions (XMX)--128
Ray Tracing Units (RTU)--8
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz2,000 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--2,050 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s65.6 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate256 GTexel/s131.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.19 TFLOPS4.2 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance512 GFLOPS1,049.6 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoArc A380
DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL2.13.0
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.6

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.