AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 460

VS
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano101% better
17,28217% of 104,598
Radeon RX 460
8,5978% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 Nano has 101% better performance than the Radeon RX 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
Radeon RX 460
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 16% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: AMD Radeon RX 7600.

Shop Radeon R9 Nano
Shop Radeon RX 460
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Summary

#

About the AMD Radeon R9 Nano GPU

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is an end-of-life desktop graphics card that released in Q3 2015 with a MSRP of $649. It is built on the GCN 3.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Fiji) and is manufactured on a 28 nm process.

Memory

The R9 Nano has 4 GB of HBM memory, with a 500 MHz memory clock and a 4,096 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 512 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The R9 Nano includes 4,096 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,000 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 256 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 64 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The R9 Nano occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports HDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2 display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 450 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 175 W.

Benchmark Performance & Value

The R9 Nano has the 133rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 16.52% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090. Its 17,282 score and $649 launch price (MSRP) gives it a performance per dollar of 26.63. This is the 82nd best in value for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

About the AMD Radeon RX 460 GPU

The AMD Radeon RX 460 is a desktop graphics card that launched in Q3 2016. It is built on the GCN 4.0 GPU microarchitecture (codename Baffin) and is manufactured on a 14 nm process.

Memory

The RX 460 has 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, with a 1,750 MHz memory clock and a 128 bit interface. This gives it a memory bandwidth of 112 Gb/s, which affects how fast it can transfer data to and from memory. GPU memory stores temporary data that helps the GPU with complex math and graphics operations. More memory is generally better, as not having enough can cause performance bottlenecks.

Cores and Clock Speeds

The RX 460 includes 896 stream processors (SPs), the processing units for handling parallel computing tasks. The GPU operates at a core clock speed of 1,090 MHz and can dynamically boost its clock speed up to 1,200 MHz. Complementing the processing units are 56 texture mapping units (TMUs) for efficient texture filtering and 16 render output units (ROPs) for pixel processing.

Compatibility & Power Consumption

The RX 460 occupies 2 PCIe expansion slots. It supports DVI, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a display connections. AMD recommends a power supply of at least 250 W to handle the GPU's thermal design power (TDP) of 75 W.

Benchmark Performance

The RX 460 has the 193rd best 3DMark 11 Performance GPU score among the 543 benchmarked GPUs in our database. It achieves 8.22% of the performance of the best benchmarked GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

General Info

General overview of the GPU, including details like its manufacturer, release date, launch price, and current production status.

InfoRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
ManufacturerAMDAMD
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 4.0
Market SegmentDesktopDesktop
Release DateQ3 2015Q3 2016
Launch Price (MSRP)$649--
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ShopCheck PriceCheck Price

Gaming Performance

#

Select a game to compare FPS metrics

Display FPS for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Display FPS for Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur's Gate 3
Display FPS for Flight Simulator 2020
Flight Simulator 2020
Display FPS for F1 2020
F1 2020
Display FPS for Gears Tactics
Gears Tactics
Display FPS for Borderlands 3
Borderlands 3
Display FPS for Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2

FPS Benchmarks

This table showcases the average frame rate (FPS) achieved both GPUs in at various resolutions. Frame rate is a crucial indicator of how smoothly the GPU can run the game. A higher FPS generally translates to a smoother gameplay experience.

  • Frames Per Second
FPS data for Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Radeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
Low - 1080p
--
18 FPS
Medium - 1080p
--
--
High - 1080p
--
--
Ultra - 1080p
--
10 FPS
QHD - 1440p
--
--
4K UHD - 2160p
--
--
FPS Source: Notebookcheck

Compare Frames Per Second (FPS)

The average frame rate (FPS) in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, higher FPS results in a smoother gameplay experience.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon RX 460
GPUFrames Per Second
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER35.2+262%
Radeon RX 48028.5+193%
Arc A31023.7+144%
Radeon RX 4609.72

Compare Cost Per Frame

The average cost per frame in can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. Generally, a lower cost per frame implies better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon RX 460
GPUCost Per Frame
Our database does not have enough data to compare the FPS per dollar with other GPUs.

Benchmark Performance

#
Performance
Radeon R9 Nano101% better
17,28217% of 104,598
Radeon RX 460
8,5978% of 104,598

The Radeon R9 Nano has 101% better performance than the Radeon RX 460 for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark.

The Radeon R9 Nano is ranked 133rd with a score of 17,282, and the Radeon RX 460 is ranked 193rd with a score of 8,597.

Performance per dollar
Radeon R9 Nano
26.6316% of 161.45
Radeon RX 460
No data available

The Radeon R9 Nano has 41% of the performance per dollar compared to the leader for the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

Radeon R9 Nano's 26.63 performance per dollar ranks it 82nd among the other benchmarked GPUs in our database.

Relative Performance

The average score in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative performance. Generally, powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano or
GPUBenchmark Performance
Radeon R9 FURY17,543+2%
GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB)17,401+1%
Radeon R9 Nano17,282
Radeon R9 290X16,167.5-6%
GeForce GTX 97016,033-7%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti9,453-45%
GeForce GTX 5909,166.5-47%
Radeon RX 4608,597-50%
GeForce GTX 10508,571-50%
Radeon R7 3708,518.5-51%

Relative Value For Money

The average performance per dollar in the benchmark test can be compared to similar GPUs to assess relative value. A higher score implies a better value for your money.

Choose Baseline GPU:Radeon R9 Nano orRadeon RX 460
GPUPerformance Per Dollar
GeForce GTX 980 Ti35.53+33%
GeForce GTX 98032.07+20%
Radeon R9 FURY31.95+20%
Radeon R9 290X29.45+11%
GeForce GTX 660 Ti28.14+6%
Radeon R9 Nano26.63
GeForce GTX 780 Ti22.34-16%
GeForce GTX 68020.47-23%
GeForce GTX 59013.11-51%

Benchmark Scores

This table showcases the average performance scores achieved by both GPUs across industry-standard benchmark tests. These scores provide a valuable insight into overall performance. Powerful GPUs tend to have higher scores.

  • Popular
BenchmarkRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
4,511
(+160.6%)
1,731
3DMark Time Spy Score
4,556
(+137.79%)
1,916
3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
81,374
(+133.22%)
34,892
3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
14,362
(+151.92%)
5,701
3DMark 11 Performance Score
14,793
(+66.81%)
8,868
PassMark G3D Mark
--
4,102
PassMark G2D Mark
--
567
Benchmarks Source: Notebookcheck

Technical Specs

#

Graphics Processor

General information about the graphics processing unit like their architecture, manufacturing process size, and transistor count. Newer GPU architectures generally bring efficiency improvements and may introduce technologies that enhance graphical capabilities.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
CodenameFijiBaffin
ArchitectureGCN 3.0GCN 4.0
Process Size28 nm14 nm
Transistors8,900 million3,000 million

Memory Details

Memory specifications like their capacity, bandwidth, and clock speeds. GPU memory stores graphics data like frames, textures, and shadows which helps display rendered images. These specs are crucial for graphics-intense applications like gaming and 3D modeling.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
Memory Size4 GB2 GB
Memory TypeHBMGDDR5
Memory Bandwidth512 Gb/s112 Gb/s
Memory Clock500 MHz1,750 MHz
Memory Interface4,096 bit128 bit
L1 Cache16 KB16 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1,024 KB

Board Compatibility

Compatibility information like their slot size, bus interface, power consumption, and display support. These specs are useful for verifying compatibility with your motherboard, power supply, and monitor.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
Slots2 slots2 slots
Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Thermal Design Power (TDP)175 W75 W
Suggested PSU450 W250 W
Power Connectors1x 8-pin--
OutputsHDMI 1.4a, DisplayPort 1.2DVI, HDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4a

Cores & Clock Speeds

Processing power information like its cores and clock speed. These specs impact how fast they can process graphics. Each type of core or component serves a specific computational purpose.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
Stream Processors (SP)4,096896
Compute Units (CU)6414
Texture Mapping Units (TMU)25656
Render Output Units (ROP)6416
Core Clock Speed1,000 MHz1,090 MHz
Core Clock Speed (Boost)--1,200 MHz

Theoretical Performance

Theoretical performance numbers derived from the raw specifications of the different components like core count and clock speeds. While these provide a glimpse into peak processing power, they do not represent real-world performance.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
Pixel Fill Rate64 GPixel/s19.2 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate256 GTexel/s67.2 GTexel/s
FP32 Performance8.19 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
FP64 Performance512 GFLOPS134.4 GFLOPS

API Support

Graphics API versions supported by these graphics cards. APIs evolve over time, introducing new features and functionalities. Older GPUs may not support recent versions.

SpecRadeon R9 NanoRadeon RX 460
DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
OpenCL2.12.1
OpenGL4.64.6
Shader Model6.56.7

Check out these comparisons for similar GPUs:

Looking for alternatives? Check out these similar GPUs:

* Performance rating, performance per dollar, and rankings are based on the 3DMark 11 Performance GPU benchmark and MSRP.